Friday, May 21, 2010


Earlier this month At Haitian agriculture minister announced that his government had accepted a "gift of 475,947 kilograms [about 523.6 US tons] of hybrid corn seeds along with 2,067 kilograms of vegetable seeds" from the Monsanto Company.

You get where this is going don't you?

Well, Monsanto said these were generically modified seeds.  Who would doubt there word.  Let's say they are telling the truth.  Let's say they are just sending mostly hybrid seeds like they say.  Hybrid seeds don’t have a great track record for re-planting, which means that farmers typically must buy new seeds every year.  Guess who sells them?

The number one recommendation of a recent report by Catholic Relief Services on post-earthquake Haiti is to focus on local seed fairs and not to introduce new or “improved” varieties at this time.  Chavannes Jean-Baptiste of the Peasant Movement of Papay and the National Peasant Movement of the Papay Congress said in a recent article published by Grassroots International that “if people start sending hybrid, NGO seeds, that’s the end of Haitian agriculture.”

Monsanto’s donation – just like the US government’s in-kind food aid donations – should empower rather than dis-empower the rural communities working to grow food for their country over the long term. 

Does anyone think that's what Monsanto has in mind?

The following is from the Black Commentator.

Guinea Pigs for Global Corporations - Solidarity America
By John Funiciello - Columnist

Transnational corporations are consolidating their stranglehold over food and food production, not just in the U.S., but also around the world.
Our own country is a very important market for them, since it is the most lucrative market, but there is trouble brewing in the food system and it involves strange diseases and maladies among young and old that the medical establishment can’t seem to understand, let alone resolve.

This week, the press reported that a recent analysis of U.S. health data links ADHD (attention deficit hyperactive disorder) with exposure to chemicals that are commonly and widely used in the production of fruits and vegetables.

Although the research is not conclusive, researchers say that the study points in the direction of chemical residues - pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and other chemicals that delay or speed up ripening or preserve the food - that children consume when they eat the food.

Only researchers in public health (or individual health for that matter) are required to prove so conclusively that something is dangerous. The chemical and other industries that are involved in filling the shelves of America’s supermarkets virtually have to prove nothing before they are allowed to pour their products into the environment - and onto and into humans.

Of the approximately 80,000 chemicals in use today, only several hundred are tested to ensure that they are safe for people and for the environment before they are put into routine use. The biosphere is full of such chemicals and the result of their combinations, over time, is completely unknown - perhaps unknowable. Yet, new chemicals continue to be added to the brew.

Where do they all go? For the most part, they go directly into the bodies of individuals, they go onto crop fields, into the air, and they go into the groundwater. From the groundwater, they go into the lakes, streams, and rivers, and then into the oceans. Casual observers know that the oceans have been in serious trouble, even before the monumental spill by British Petroleum in the Gulf of Mexico that continues today.

Another problem that should continue to be a topic of heated discussion in coming months and years is the use of genetically manipulated - commonly known as “genetically modified” or GMOs - plants used for food.
GMOs were developed as a way to corner the seed market, which, to a great extent, has been accomplished by Monsanto, a St. Louis-based chemical and seed transnational corporation. GMO plants (and, even, animals) can be patented and profits can be made from them. Of course, Monsanto has not managed to control of all seeds in the world, but they have made great progress toward that end.

As much as 70-80 percent of U.S. corn seed is reported to be GMO, along with soybean seed, which is said to be 91 percent GMO in the U.S. That means that most of the prepared foods in America that contain either soy or corn are genetically manipulated.
Monsanto, which holds patents on such crops, makes huge profits from the patents. Their position as part of Corporate America helps to consolidate their power over farmers and growers, as the national seed pool is inexorably shrunk to include mostly their seeds and their chemicals, which are needed to grow them.

A study that is not scheduled to be released until July was recently reported by Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, in Huffington Post last month, who noted that experiments on hamsters have shown severe damage from ingestion of GMO foods.

The experiment, by two Russian scientific organizations, Smith wrote, showed that “after feeding hamsters for two years over three generations, those on the GM diet, and especially the group on the maximum GM soy diet, showed devastating results. By the third generation, most GM soy-fed hamsters lost the ability to have babies. They also suffered slower growth, and a high mortality rate among the pups.”

He pointed out that the problems did not show up in the first, or even the second generation, but that the third generation was the one that paid the price. The full study is likely to paint a broader picture. While it’s true that hamsters are not people, the effects of this study should give pause to those who wish to plunge headlong into the full use of every genetically manipulated plant that can be developed for general use as food for humans.

Why is this a special problem for those who live in cities? It is especially a problem for the poor and working class Americans who live in cities, because they usually don’t have the means or knowledge to seek out non-GMO foods. They have few choices in supermarkets, when one is available, so they eat more prepared and fast foods.

Those foods contain much of the genetically manipulated crops and they are the ones that are hugely subsidized by the government, so they can be sold more cheaply as fast foods and other prepared foods. Again, the long-term effects are unknown.

In the last two weeks, there was a story in a weekly farm paper that described a “donation” of corn seed to 4,500 Haitian farmers. When asked, who the donor was, the public relations woman said the donor wished to remain anonymous, which immediately raises a flag of suspicion. What kind of seed was donated? Were they genetically manipulated? Tragedies like the January earthquake could enhance U.S. seed companies’ efforts to spread their GMO seeds.

At the same time, Marguerite Laurent (aka Ezili Danto), founder and president of the Haitian Lawyers Leadership Network (HLLN), has questioned a donation of 475 tons of seed corn offered to Haitian farmers by Monsanto. The company has reportedly told concerned Haitians that the seed is not GMO, but many remain skeptical.

Transnational corporations are working to capture the seed market in every country possible, even though the long-term effects on humans (and other creatures) who eat the GMO foods are not known and may not be able to be determined for two more generations.

Although so many questions remain about the use of GMO seeds for every crop possible, their use is being encouraged and promoted by the U.S., presumably as a way of extending and enhancing Corporate America’s economic hegemony over scores of other countries.
President Barack Obama has named proponents of GMO technology to his administration and they occupy important policy positions in his government.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack was a strong proponent of GMOs well before Obama nominated him.

Islam Siddiqui is now the chief agricultural negotiator for the U.S. trade representative in the Obama Administration. He formerly served as vice president for science and regulatory affairs at CropLife America, where he was in charge of issues related to crop protection chemicals around the world.

And, CropLife, the powerful trade organization for producers and distributors of “crop protection products,” otherwise known as pesticides, was notable - before Siddiqui’s nomination - for its criticism of Michelle Obama’s creation of an organic garden on the White House grounds. It’s obvious why CropLife was critical.

The Organic Consumers Association generated strong opposition to the naming by Obama of former Monsanto lobbyist Michael Taylor as a Food and Drug Administration senior advisor on “food safety.”
OCA stated at the time: “Michael Taylor should not be a senior FDA food safety adviser. The vice president for public policy at Monsanto Corp. from 1998 until 2001, Taylor exemplifies the revolving door between the food industry and the government agencies that regulate it.”

It’s long past the time when Americans should have had a full discussion and debate on our food system and its effects on individual health, public health, and the sustainability of our family farm agriculture. Until that happens - and until people are educated thoroughly about food production - Americans will continue to be the victims of a system that for decades has put profits above individual and public health.

When Americans have that debate and take action, all of the other countries - like Haiti - that are victims of the same forces, will benefit by Americans having reined in their bully corporations. Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor organizer and former union organizer. His union work started when he became a local president of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s. He was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers in New York State. In addition to labor work, he is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on the land under enormous pressure from factory food producers and land developers. Click here to contact Mr. Funiciello.

No comments: