Tuesday, September 11, 2007


The head of the Utah Division of Indian Affairs says the Mormon Church should stop blaming an 1857 massacre on the Paiute Tribe.

Forest Cuch says the church has "villainized" Indians by associating Paiutes for the Mountain Meadows Massacre on September 11 1857. About 150 men, women and children were killed in the attack.

The massacre at Mountain Meadows has been the focus of passionate debate among Mormons and the people of Utah. It is a debate that cuts to the core of the basic tenets of Mormonism. This, the darkest stain on the history of the religion, is a bitter reality and challenging predicament for a modern Mormon Church struggling to shed its extremist history.

Will Bagley, author of "Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows," said he doesn't feel that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints will ever get past the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

As far as making steps toward healing, Bagley said he believes first, the LDS Church needs to step up and seek forgiveness from the Paiutes and the descendants, but said he is not optimistic that this will happen

After the massacre, the church first claimed that local Paiute Indians, but later gave that up.

Well, not completely.

They still like to make it sound like it was a joint operation.

The Paiutes are tired of that blood libel.

Glenn Rogers, chairman of the Shivwits band of Paiutes, in an article published in southern Utah's Spectrum, said an apology from those who placed the blame on the Paiutes would be fine, but primarily, the Paiutes want to see the history books changed to show the Indians were not involved in the killings.

"We would like to see the history books put straight," Rogers said.

Rogers said growing up, his grandmother talked about the massacre and, according to the oral history he was told, four Paiutes were present but did not take part in the killings.

Rogers said an archaeological dig at the grave site and exhuming bodies for studies could shed some light on what really happened and how the emigrants were killed.

"Who would have given Native Americans a rifle, let alone a knife?" Rogers asked. "They took everything away (from us) and that's just the way it was."

Rogers would like the truth to be told and those responsible for the massacre to be accountable.

But like Bagley, he is not optimistic.

By the way, before I go, I would like to point out that the Mormons are certainly not alone in carrying out massacres in the name of religion. Virtually all religions include such sagas in their respective histories. It seems to go with the territory.

The following is from the Deseret Morning News (Utah).

Indians' role in massacre disputed
By Carrie A. Moore

CEDAR CITY — On the eve of the 150th anniversary of the Mountain Meadows Massacre, a state official told descendants of massacre victims Monday that the LDS Church needs to stop associating the Paiute Indians with the slaughter of 150 unarmed men, women and children.

Forest Cuch, executive director of the Utah Division of Indian Affairs and a member of the Ute Tribe, praised members of Mountain Meadows Monument Foundation, saying he appreciates how "they won't let the myth (surrounding responsibility for the massacre) die. You are striving for the truth, and it has to come forth sooner or later."

The foundation is one of two groups of massacre victims' descendants seeking federal stewardship of the Mountain Meadows site, owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It was local leaders of the church in the Cedar City area who ordered the massacre by LDS militiamen, a fact that has long been discussed by historians but only acknowledged publicly by the church in recent months.

For years, many blamed local Indians as the planners and perpetrators.

Today's anniversary ceremony — which includes the foundation as one of three different groups of descendants, along with representatives from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — will begin at 10 a.m. at Mountain Meadows.

Cuch said while several authors have written books about the massacre, "What about a book about the cover-up and the more recent actions that have taken place? I challenge someone to take that on. I'm too busy to write it because I'm writing my own," about the history of American Indians.

Cuch said he's tired of hearing that Paiute Indians were involved with the massacre every time culpability is publicly discussed.

"This afternoon I was interviewed out here by Channel 5 — which is owned by the LDS Church. In that interview, I said there seems to be a significant amount of evidence to suggest that Paiutes were not perpetrators, and if they were involved, it would have been one or two. That doesn't constitute a tribe or a band, for that matter," he said.

"So what happens — later this afternoon, a partner and I were watching the Channel 5 news and they state once again that this involves the Mormon militia and their Indian allies," he said. "When you own the media, you can pretty much say what you want."

Even so, Cuch said, "The LDS Church has got to stop making that association. They're constantly associating the Mormon militia with the Indians. Instead, say there were 60 members of the Mormon militia and two Paiute Indians.

"They need to stop perpetrating that association because we are already villains in history. We continue to be villainized in history."

Cuch said American Indians understand wars and massacres, as they have been victims of many, including the Bear River Massacre in 1863 near the northern Utah border. Approximately 240 Utah Indians were killed by the California militia, he said.

"Massacres are certainly nothing new to us," he said. "So why is this so important to someone like me?"

Cuch detailed the history lessons he learned in school throughout his youth. American Indians were either cast as villains or simply ignored altogether. That one-sided portrayal of history — always from a white perspective — did harm to his self-worth, he said.

It wasn't until he got to high school that he was told about the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

"That was a real punch in the head. I was told the Indians attacked and killed the settlers, the women and the children. They didn't say anything about the Mormon militia," he said. "I hadn't heard the other side. Just like I was told (as a child) that the Pilgrims only discovered 'wilderness,'" instead of Indian inhabitants.

"You start doubting yourself and your family and wondering, 'Who are we and why do we do things like that?'... I hadn't heard the other side so, in my head, all we did was stand in the way of progress and attack people."

Cuch said he wants young people of all backgrounds to understand the truth about history, particularly concerning American Indians — that they welcomed the Pilgrims and fed them so they wouldn't starve to death that first winter in New England.

"Squanto knew where the food was. If he was a lesser man, could have stood there and watched them starve. He could have feasted, then come and watched those people die. But he didn't — he showed them where the food was. Why isn't he a founding father in our history books?"

American Indians have fought in every war "in a greater proportion than any other ethnic group in the country and we continue to fight for it."

Those facts are vital, he said, because "it's important for the truth to prevail. Only through the truth can hearts heal and heroes rise to the fore."

One-sided history warps thinking and sows the seeds of self-doubt and — for some — self-destruction when self respect is not fostered with the whole story, he said. By reading as much as he could about American Indian history once he graduated from college, "I found my way out of it. I found the truth and it made me whole and complete.

"I join with you in striving for the truth and may we stay joined to continue to accomplish great things," he said. "May our efforts have the blessing of God."

1 comment:

l dean said...

I am a descendant of Captain John "Twitty" Baker, co-captain of the wagon train massacred at Mountain Meadow. Members of my family attended the 3 day "memorial and dedication" in Cedar City UT in 1990. Before entering the auditorium we had to reliquish all recording devices and cameras. We were told that the LDS church was recording the ceremony and copies would be made available. (Copies were available, but only after many deletions). This is what was deleted: Mr. Hinkley spoke and specifically exonerated the Paiute Indians stating they did not participate in the Massacre. Also edited out of the video was a prayer and song performed by the Chief of the Paiute nation (forgive me, I do not recall his name. Another deletion from the recording was when Mr. Hinkley apologized on behalf of the LDS church - he asked that if there was any persons in attendance in the university coliseum that either knew someone, or was related to someone who participated in the Massacre to please stand. Approximately 50% of the people stood. During the three days, we readily learned that the "dedication and memorial" was more for the descendents of John D. Lee because he was "honored" during the ceremony at the Meadows, his excommunication was taken back by the LDS church, as well as all his descendents. Nine years later, at a "rededication" at the burial site at Mountain Meadow in 1999, then president Hinkley disavows any LDS church involvement with his statement, "That which we have done here [reburial of disturbed bones of massacre victims] must never be construed as an acknowledgment on the part of the church of any complicity in the occurrrences of that fateful and tragic day." It appears the LDS Church merely placated the Baker-Fancher massacre descendents and the Paiute Nation in 1990. President Hinkley left no question that the Church will continue to lie about the cover-up and their responsibility for the slaughter of more than 120 men, women and children at a place called Mountain Meadow AND try to place the blame on the Paiute Nation.