Wednesday, November 09, 2005

NORTHERN IRELAND NEWS UPADATE


The Oread Daily reported recently on the “stand down” by the paramilitary thug group knows as the Loyalist Volunteer Force (LVF).

What I didn’t report at the time was the terror group, described by some as drug dealers with guns and badges, is not likely to be giving up their lucrative drug trade.

"Whether or not they step down, as they have said in the past week is one thing. But drug dealing is what these people do for a living and have been for years, and it's unlikely that they are going to give that up now," warned a senior security source quoted in the Belfast Telegraph. "They have come out with their statement because they have been under intense pressure from the Ulster Volunteer Forces (UVF), and for no other reason. If they are serious about standing down they will have to give up their guns and stop dealing drugs and I don't see that happening.”

Meanwhile, the larger Loyalist group, the Ulster Defense Association (UDA), is looking like its going to have to let its North Belfast boss go. Andre Shoukri was arrested yesterday along with his brother Ihab Shoukri, a female relative, and two other men in a series of early morning raids. The arrests came after a woman approached the Police Services of Northern Ireland (PSNI) with information on illegal money making rackets being run by the north Belfast UDA. Since joining the UDA in the mid-1990s, Shoukri has been in regular trouble with the law. In 1996 he was jailed for his involvement in the death of Dubliner Gareth Parker who was run over by a car after being punched by Shoukri. The loyalist was back in court in 1998, when he was jailed for attempting to smuggle cigarettes. Two years later he was jailed again for his part in a blackmail plot against a Catholic businessman. During the 2002 UDA feud, Shoukri was arrested with a gun in his car. He was initially jailed for six years but the conviction was overturned on appeal.

Shoukri is viewed by many within the UDA as being in the same mould as former east Belfast boss Jim Gray who was “stood down” and then murdered. Shoukri has powerful enemies within the organization including its south Belfast leader Jackie McDonald. McDonald and Shoukri’s UDA factions clashed during the summer when a number of bars that their supporters drink in were paint-bombed.

And while this is going on the US Administration of G.W. Bush has gone ahead and denied Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams a fundraising visa to visit the U.S. The Friends of Sinn Féin funding event in New York City that Adams was due to attend will go ahead as planned. Sinn Fein News says, “The decision appears to be an effort by elements within the US Administration to get Sinn Féin to change its' position on policing, something which can only be done by Sinn Féin and their electorate.”

Adams said, "Our position on policing is very clear. The British government has agreed to honor certain commitments made on the policing issue. When they do this I will honor commitments I have made including going to a special party Ard Fheis to deal with this matter.”

"The visa position is absurd,” he added. “I am expected to go to New York and not attend the most important Friends of Sinn Féin funding event of the year, an event incidentally that will go ahead as planned. The decision robs me of the opportunity to speak in person to over 1000 US citizens who have consistently supported the peace process. They want to hear how we can make best use of the recent historic republican initiatives to move the peace process forward.”

U.S. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y, said the State Department's decision was ``misguided and wrong and lacks any sense of historical perspective. After Gerry Adams and Sinn Fein have demonstrated enormous courage and leadership in doing so much to take the gun out of Irish politics this decision sends exactly the wrong message.''

Adams who announced yesterday he has cancelled his entire trip to the US (but not a scheduled visit to Canada) was due to receive a peace award Tuesday from the National Committee on American Foreign Policy at a dinner hosted by Bill Flynn, a leading Irish-American businessman. Sources: Irish Aires News, Belfast Telegraph, Sinn Fein News

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

HERE IS HOPING THE PARTY TURNS OUT TO BE A GOOD ONE


From the California Nurses Ogranization

The California Nurses Association, which has followed Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for more than a year with over 100 protests at his appearances, will be next to the governor on election night as well.


CNA is hosting an "Aloha" party at Trader Vic's Restaurant in the Beverly
Hilton hotel where Schwarzenegger is holding his own election night public
party. Dress: tropical.

When: Tuesday night, November 8
Where: Trader Vic's Restaurant
Beverly Hilton
9876 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills
Time: Media availability from 5 p.m. 'till the drinks run out

To honor the $300 million consumed for the unnecessary special election,
the nurses will wear money leis and serve corporate roast pork in recognition
of those special favors in exchange for all that corporate cash.

Other possible menu selections offered as tribute to Schwarzenegger
include minced principles, twice cooked promises, spare no corporate favor
ribs, sticky fingers on healthcare funding rice, disappearing pineapple
education budget cake, and the ever popular Maui Fizz drinks on behalf of the
governor's dwindling public standing.

In addition to the levity, partygoers will describe the one-year CNA
campaign, which has been a model for the nation in confronting corporate
control of California's political, economic and social life with an emphasis
on grassroots mobilizations and novel tactics.

"For more than a year, California nurses have been the conscience of
California, following the governor and exposing his degrading of our political
system and democracy on behalf of his corporate donors," said CNA Executive
Director Rose Ann DeMoro.

"Tonight will be just another chapter in our campaign. Nurses challenged
Gov. Schwarzenegger and the corporate right agenda to eliminate corporate
checks and balances in our political system, starve education and public
health funding, and increase corporate dominance of our society, long before
these initiatives were on the ballot," said DeMoro.

"We will continue to campaign on behalf of genuine reform tomorrow and the
day after."

TENSIONS ON THE RISE AGAIN IN THE CONGO


There are reports of leaflets being circulated in the eastern regions of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) that warn of new violence on the horizon.

A missionary source in Bukavu, the main town of South Kivu, told the Catholic news agency FIDES there were signs that the civil war which ravaged the country from 1998 to 2003 could flare up again.

"We are living in fear. We keep receiving mysterious leaflets saying war is imminent" the unnamed missionary said. "Bukavu is living in fear and apprehension as mysterious leaflets are circulated announcing fresh hostilities."

The unnamed source said the Congolese Tutsi rebels, or Banyamulenge are split between two factions. One faction wants to renew hostilities, while the other prefers peace.

"There are those who realize they have no chance of winning regular elections without violence and fraud and are willing to use every means to sabotage the electoral process. Then there are others anxious to continue exploiting Congo's mineral riches in total impunity denying the due profit to the local people and the legitimate government," the FIDES source said.

Tensions were already high in the area following attacks last month against the village of Kanyola south of Bukavu where at least 25 were killed and hundreds left injured. The UN reported that thousands had fled the area. The UN reported at the time that the attack by a group of 'Rasta' - Rwandan rebel group recently emerging on the scene - also affected other villages near Kanyola such as Tchindudi, Mungombe and Rudundu.

The South Kivu governor, Didas Kaningini Kyoto told Reuters AletNet that the attackers did not use guns because "they did not want to be noticed by soldiers at an army base on a hill nearby." He added: "They killed their victims with machetes and axes, smashing victims’ heads in with hammers."

The Rwandan Hutu rebels in the DR Congo are under increasing pressure from the UN and regional states to disarm and return to their home country. As a result, more splits have been reported among the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (DFLR) who include former ex-Rwandan Army Forces, former Interahamwe militias involved in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and young men recruited in the Rwandan refugee camps in the Congo.

One dissident group has been making tentative moves towards a mediated negotiation with Rwanda, but at the same time there are suspicions that factions in the Kinshasa transitional government are not keen that the forces should be totally disbanded.

In South Kivu, armed groups composed of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (DFLR) dissidents such as the so-called 'Rasta' group have been proliferating in the Walungu region.

They do not appear to have specific political aims to justify their murder, rape and looting. Other DFLR defectors have joined a Mai-Mai tribal Congolese militia led by 'Commander' Jackson Muhura Mboto, which is creating havoc in the Myamilima North Kivu region, at the Ugandan border. Sources: UN Mission in Democratic Republic of the Congo, Catholic Information Service for Africa, IRIN, Reuters AlertNet

SEVEN ARRESTED AT VERMONT NUCLEAR PROTEST


Seven women were arrested on trespassing charges Monday while protesting a proposed power increase for Etergy's Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. The women were charged with unlawful trespass and then released.

The women were ordered to not cross the police tape or go onto Entergy's lawn. They did so at about 11 a.m., after an hour of speeches in the parking lot across the road where they and supporters were permitted to protest. Protesters made demands for legislative action, a switch from nuclear energy to alternative energy sources, and an evacuation plan in Massachusetts towns like Gill and Wendall, located just outside the 10-mile radius zone from Vermont Yankee. The federal government requires the power plant to alert towns within a 10-mile radius of an emergency.

"We living in Massachusetts are subject to the pollution downwind, but we have no say," said Sally Shaw, who lives in Gill, Mass.

Sally Shaw, 49, of Gill, Mass., said she and the others were protesting because they felt shut out of the regulatory process as federal and state agencies consider if Vermont Yankee can boost its power production. “There’s a lot of frustration because many of us feel we have been left out of the process," Shaw said. "And all we could do is utilize our right to speak the truth on our own terms."

Protesters had requested to speak to Entergy officials, but were denied.

Shaw told Barre Montpelier Times Argus the she hopes legislators in Massachusetts and Vermont press for the development of renewable energy. She also criticized the NRC — a federal agency that she dubbed the "Nuclear Advocacy Council" — for allegedly bowing to industry demands. "The process is broken and rigged and we are tired of the pretense," she said.

Sunny Miller, executive director of the Traprock Peace Center in Deerfield, Mass., told the Brattleboro Reformer the protest was a form of "direct action." And, even at the risk of arrest, protesters wanted to communicate concerns about the Vernon reactor. "We are organizing appeals and demands directly to the decision-makers operating this facility," Miller said.

Amongst concerns cited in an open letter to Congressman John Olver are:

*A 20% power increase, even accomplished in two steps, is an extreme uprate. Most uprates have been accomplished in smaller steps and been for a smaller increase.

• An increase in power output requires more steam/water to be passed through the system at a faster rate; this subjects all components to greatly increased stresses and vibrations. These effects can lead to making parts break off or to breaking of pipes which can cause major malfunctions in the rest of the power station.

• Operation under uprate shortens time available for operator response and increases the likelihood of a malfunction due to operator error.

• The limited inspection review provided by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was inadequate. Information and analyses provided by Entergy were incomplete and inadequate. Vermont state legislator Steve Darrow said that Entergy gave evasive answers to questions asked. He testified at Vermont Public Service Board hearing that Entergy is gaming the process.

• The recent fueling of the nuclear reactor with more highly enriched uranium in advance of completion of the uprate approval process and prior to a ruling by the Vermont Public Service Board on the acceptability of the inspection report is unacceptable.

• Instead of providing a comprehensive analysis of the ability of components to handle the increased stresses, the NRC is proposing to allow Entergy to stress test components during the process of ramping up the power level. We hold that such an experimental approach to assessing the operation represents an irresponsible approach and an unacceptable risk.

• David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists said that such experiments belong in a laboratory, not in communities.

• We are aware that similar uprates at other reactors of this type have caused costly shutdowns due to potentially dangerous steam dryer cracking and valve jamming. Cracks are known to exist in VY’s steam dryers, which are identical to the Quad Cities unit that failed in Illinois.

• In addition, the Entergy request to run the ENVY reactor at containment overpressure is a potentially dangerous and operationally confusing condition that puts the public at risk.

• It may be seen that in addition to safety concerns, the power uprate will reduce the reliability of existing power production at the reactor.

• We are concerned to read in the March 22, 2005 Federal Register that Entergy is no longer reequired to report annual occupational radiation exposure for its workers. This suggests relaxation of safety standards for public and workers alike at a time when risks of harm are heightened by the uprate.
Sources: Brattleboro Reformer (Vermont), Open Letter to Congressman John Olver, Boston Globe, Barre Montpelier Times Argus (Vermont)

RELIEF PITCHER UNDER ARREST IN VENEZUELA


Philadelphia Phillies relief pitcher Ugueth Urbina has been arrested in Venezuela on charges that he and a group of friends attacked employees at his ranch with machetes and tried to set fire to them, police said on Tuesday.

"He's been captured and he's held in one of our cells," investigative police commissioner Marcos Chavez told Reuters by telephone.

Bernardo Navarro (23), Vincler Gallegos (20), Ricardo Osal (21), Tony Rodriguez (34), Jose Tovar, Argenis Faras and Key Duarte accuse Urbina of abuse and beatings.

VHeadlines reports that on arrival in Venezuela and at reception to welcome him back to the farm, Urbina and guests rounded the workers up to find out who stole a missing weapon.

The workers allege that Urbina used machete and his fists to elicit information and threw gasoline and thinner on some of them causing minor burns.

Urbina says he is innocent of the charges against him.

“Everything will be cleared up soon and people will know the truth,” Urbina said from his cell at a police station. “Right now we aren’t going to do anything to deny things that aren’t true.”

Urbina’s lawyer, Jose Luis Tamayo, said the pitcher was sleeping at the time of the incident and was not involved.

A state prosecutor has taken on the case and will investigate whether Urbina did what the workers accuse him of or whether they are trying to get easy money from the big-leaguer. Sources: VHeadlines, Delaware on Line, Bloomberg, Guardian

Monday, November 07, 2005

GIDDY UP LITTLE KLUXERS AND GO ON HOME


It was not a good day for the Ku Klux Klan in Austin, Texas Saturday. Not a good day at all.

Ten men and four women calling themselves members of the American White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan gathered at City Hall plaza Saturday for a brief rally against gay marriage. The group said they were from San Angelo in West Texas. "We're asking Texans to vote for Proposition Number 2," Klan chaplain Steven Edwards told the crowds through loudspeakers set up on the plaza. "Not because the Ku Klux Klan supports it but because God supports it." Some Klan members, all of whom were dressed in black uniforms or jeans with Klan T-shirts, hid their faces behind masks made from Confederate battle flags.

The Kluxers were protected by about 200 police.

The opposition numbered at least 3000. Many anti-Kluxer demonstrators carried yellow daisies, sang peace songs and chanted anti-Klan slogans. Some held banners or signs that read, "Vote Against Bigotry," "Vote Against the Klan" and "Killers, Kowards, Kooks Go Away."

Protesters, including Bonn Ramsey of Austin, said they hope that the Klan's rally will encourage moderate Texans to vote against Proposition 2 on Election Day Tuesday. "People will think at the ballot: 'Do I really want to support what the KKK endorses?'" Ramsey said. "Austin's riled up now. It reaffirms the work we have to do."

Former state Rep. Glen Maxey, who is gay told the anti-Kluxers, "Our role today is to stand against their bigotry, their hate and Proposition 2." Maxey, campaign director for the group No Nonsense in November, turned his back on the Klan to speak to the demonstrators, who carried signs with messages such as "keep Austin tolerant" and "selectively denying rights is prejudice."

Maxey said Tuesday's vote is important, but changing Texans' minds about discrimination is more important.

The human rights activist group Texas Civil Rights Project plans to file a federal lawsuit against the city of Austin on Monday. They claim members of certain media outlets, as well as the demonstrators opposed to the Klan, were denied access to the rally, according to President Jim Harrington. Sources: The Eagle (College Station, Texas), Daily Texan, American Statesman (Austin), KLTV (Texas)

MARCHING FOR DARFUR


Rabbi Joel Soffin is the religious leader of Temple Shalom in Succasunna New Jersey. Sunday, the rabbi, led a march around the Morristown, NJ, Green, marking each of seven laps with the blast of a shofar. The rabbi led this march because he said he could no longer stand and do nothing – not while knowing that almost a half-million people have been killed in the Darfur region of Sudan and that there has been little to no international response.

"This is a genocide,” said Soffin. "The Jewish people suffered a genocide during the Holocaust, and we can not stand by and let it happen to someone else."

The temple was joined in the march organizing by the Morris County Human Relations Commission and the United Jewish Communities of Metro West NJ.

Abdelbagy Abushanab, president of the Newark-based Darfur Rehabilitation Project was forced to flee Sudan in 1992 because of his political activities. He told the marchers that two of his sisters and their five children have been missing since the conflict began about two years ago. He has been unable to find them in refugee camps. "Before we leave here today, many women will be raped and many children will die because of disease, starvation and raiding supported by the government of Sudan," he said.

Those who attended the rally said they have been disturbed by the lack of attention to the crisis.

"We have news every night about Paris Hilton's every movement, but no news about this genocide involving 1.3 million people," said David Schwartz, 50, of Randolph. Schwartz of Randolph, NJ, and an adjunct professor at Kean University who teaches about the Holocaust, said the United States has a pattern of remaining silent in the face of genocide, such as during World War II and in Rwanda. "I can't be silent and allow this to happen again," he said.

Likewise, 16-year-old Arielle Wisotsky said she was alarmed by how nothing was being done in the United States to help the Darfur people. She and two friends decided to start a nonprofit foundation to raise money to send to organizations such as Doctors Without Borders.

The Bernards teen, along with Millburn brothers David and Eric Messinger, created Help Darfur Now this fall. "No one was paying attention and I just wanted to do something," said Arielle, whose grandmother is a Holocaust survivor. "This is a systemized killing of a whole group of people -- it's no different from the Holocaust."

Just last week Human Rights Watch (HRW) sent a letter to U.S.Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick On Darfur. The letter read,

Dear Mr. Zoellick,

We are pleased that you are going to Sudan and hope that your visit will bring renewed attention to the continuing crisis in Darfur.

As you know, the security situation in Darfur has deteriorated in the past two months. This is partly due to political posturing by armed groups related to the Abuja negotiations, and is also linked to seasonal livestock migration and banditry.

However, the most significant perpetrators of armed violence against civilians remain the government-backed "Janjaweed" militias, many of whom continue to operate with the full support of, and sometimes in coordinated operations with, the Sudanese government. Human Rights Watch has also noted a recent increase in reports of abuses by rebel groups, including continuing abductions of civilians, use of children as combatants and attacks on humanitarian convoys.

As a result, the lessening of active hostilities between the warring parties in the past year has not translated into any significant improvement in protection for civilians. More than two million displaced people remain confined to camps and other locations, unable to return to their rural homes due to continuing insecurity and the impunity from prosecution of the government-backed militias. More than three million people are wholly or partly dependent on international relief aid which is increasingly threatened by banditry as well as targeted attacks on humanitarian convoys.

Improved security and protection of civilians is essential and urgently needed. The Sudanese government has utterly failed in its responsibility to protect civilians. Even worse, it continues to commit armed attacks and arbitrary detentions against the civilian populations of those communities that share the same ethnicity as the rebel forces. Despite repeated demands from the international community, including the UN Security Council, and pledges from the Sudanese government, there has been no serious action by the Sudanese government to disarm its militias, end impunity or support the African Union’s efforts to protect civilians. We are disappointed that the UN Security Council has done so little to follow up on the government’s failures to adhere to its commitments.

Taking these steps would have important positive effects on the situation in Darfur.

Instead the Sudanese government continues to pursue policies that consolidate the "ethnic cleansing" for which it is responsible and that encourage government-backed groups to commit further, more brazen, abuses.

While some of the most recent dramatic attacks on civilians have been publicized, there are many more attacks on a daily basis that are not publicly reported.

There is an urgent need for the international community-and the U.S. government in particular-to do more to protect civilians from further violence. This is particularly important given the commitment made by member states at the recent UN Global Summit to the "responsibility to protect." In the long-term, the international community must ensure that ethnic cleansing is reversed by safeguarding the right of return of displaced persons to their land and providing compensation and other redress to the victims.

If ethnic cleansing is to be reversed, the U. S. government and the international community must unequivocally signal to the Sudanese leadership that its actions in Darfur are unacceptable and that there will be serious consequences for its failure to meet its responsibilities towards its citizens. It is vital that the U.S. government take a leading role by reiterating to Sudanese policymakers that there will be no removal of bilateral U.S. sanctions on Sudan until significant improvements in Darfur, including the reversal of ethnic cleansing, are underway.

The African Union’s mission in Darfur has had some effect in preventing abuses against civilians in the areas where it has deployed, but further efforts, including additional troops and equipment and a more aggressive interpretation of the mission’s mandate are required if civilians are to be adequately protected. The U.S. should therefore urge the African Union to expedite the deployment of the remaining forces and equipment planned within the current AMIS operation. Human Rights Watch is concerned by the report that $50 million for AMIS was recently cut from the foreign operations spending bill. Along with the European Union and other donors the US should ensure that the funding needs of the existing operation and any further expansion of AMIS are met.

Human Rights Watch urges the United States to take the following actions:

Call on the Sudanese government to fully cooperate with and facilitate the African Union mission in Sudan (AMIS) including through: supporting the deployment of an enhanced AMIS presence of military personnel and civilian police; expediting clearance for armored personnel carriers and other equipment and supplies requested by AMIS; and, supporting enhanced protection of civilians including proactive patrolling and, where necessary, robust use of force by the AMIS forces.

Call on the rebel movements to immediately cease human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law against civilians including abductions, use of children within their forces, looting of civilian livestock and property, and attacks on humanitarian convoys.

Urge AMIS to proactively interpret its mandate to protect civilians and expedite the full deployment of all 6,171 military personnel, 1,560 civilian police and equipment within the current AMIS-II (Enhanced) operation.

Support an immediate and substantial expansion of the AMIS force by providing as needed increased logistical and financial support and expertise. Support AU requests for additional AMIS troops and civilian police, as well as requests for greater policing powers. Ensure that US-funded contractors providing infrastructure to the AMIS force (such as accommodation) meet their objectives in a timely way.

Strongly and publicly urge the Sudanese government to:

+ immediately cease all violations of human rights and humanitarian law, including direct attacks on civilians and the civilian population;

+ cease all "hostile military overflights" in line with previous commitments and permit AMIS to monitor aerial movements;

+ cease providing arms and logistical, financial and other support to all militia groups and cooperate with AMIS and relevant UN agencies in preparing a disarmament plan;

+ disband all Popular Defense Forces and other paramilitary groups, whether under army supervision or not, and deploy only adequately trained units of the Sudanese government armed forces in Darfur;

+ suspend from official duty, investigate and fully prosecute all civilian and military personnel, including government officials, military commanders and militia leaders, implicated for individual or command responsibility for serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law in Darfur;

+ establish an internationally monitored compensation fund for victims of human rights violations and war crimes in Darfur;

+ fully cooperate with the International Criminal Court by providing full, unimpeded access and facilitation of court staff.

On your return to the U.S., we urge you to ensure that the U.S. government plays a lead role at the UN Security Council in producing a resolution to this effect.
Regarding the current sanctions regime proposed by U.N. Security Council resolution 1591, we also hope that the U.S. will play a leading role in implementing this resolution despite divisions among the Security Council members. We urge the United States to:

Ensure that the recommendations of the Sanctions Committee Panel of Experts are promptly implemented by the Sanctions Committee of the Security Council and that penalties are immediately placed on those individuals identified as violating resolution 1591.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter. We hope to meet with you and your staff to discuss these issues in further detail.
Sources: Daily Record (Morris County, NJ), Asbury Park Press (New Jersey), International Justice Tribune, Sudan Tribune

REFUGE NO LONGER



Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) today released a letter protesting a decision by The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to expand a controversial give-away in which local farmers grow genetically modified soybeans and corn at Delaware’s Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge. PEER says the move is wreaking ecological havoc and violating the Service’s own policies.

“Plowing under high-quality grasslands to plant soybeans does wildlife no good and sets a terrible precedent affecting the entire National Wildlife Refuge System,” stated Gene Hocutt, the head of PEER’s Refuge Keeper program and a former long-time refuge manager. “Prime Hook is supposed to be a National Wildlife Refuge – not a national soybean patch!”

Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge covers some 10,000 acres but 500 of those acres are being used by local farmers to grow soybeans and corn. The farmers switched over to genetically modified crops in 2001. At that time, the Refuge took 150 acres (3 fields each about 50 acres in size) out of the farming program to participate in a regional Grassland Bird study. The study found rare plants and insects as well as unique birding opportunities. Despite those findings, the Refuge now plans to put the 150 study acres back into cultivation.

“The Fish & Wildlife Service dropped its fig leaf when it decided to give away even the little bit of acreage needed for the biological study,” Hocutt added, noting that data collection on natural plant communities and bird use will have to cease and the $200,000 spent on the study will be wasted.

PEER says the cultivation program violates Fish and Wildlife Service’s own rules.

Prime Hook NWR is located 22 miles southeast of Dover, DE, near the western shore of Delaware Bay. The refuge was established in 1963 to conserve an important segment of the Delaware Bay marshes, to protect migrating and wintering waterfowl habitat. The refuge is considered to have one of the best existing wetland habitat areas along the Atlantic Coast.

According to the Fish and Wildlife Service, “The goal of refuge management is to provide habitat for a diversity of native fish, wildlife and plants.”

Nothing is in their mandate about give aways to farmers to grow genetically altered foods.

Of course, the contamination and destruction of wildlife refuges is not new and not limited.

According to a report from Defenders of Wildlife, the large-scale threats facing the system are overwhelming the poorly staffed refuges. U.S. border and immigration policy is shifting illegal border crossing into sensitive desert habitats within Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in Arizona. A massive water diversion in California could completely alter the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR. Oil and gas wells in the McFaddin NWR have killed vegetation and polluted marshland habitat, while the Bush administration and many in Congress push plans to permit drilling in the Arctic NWR. At the Moapa NWR, a proposal to drill for water for Las Vegas may suck dry the refuge’s springs, which are vital for endangered species. Noise and habitat exclusion from a proposed jet landing field next to the Pocosin Lakes NWR threatens tens of thousands of swans, geese and ducks and the Navy pilots whose safety will be compromised by this ill-conceived plan to mix large waterfowl and fighter jets.

The report lists the ten most threatened Wildlife Refuges. “Each of these ten refuges, and the 535 other refuges in the country, is in a funding crisis,” says Rodger Schlickeisen, president of Defenders of Wildlife. “Moapa Valley NWR has only a quarter of one staff person’s time to restore and protect its fragile desert springs for an endangered species. Nearly 200 other refuges do not even have staff.

In addition, the Humane Society points out that “…because most people assume that a wildlife refuge is a safe haven for wildlife, it may come as a surprise to learn that recreational hunting and trapping are now allowed on more than 300 of the 544 refuges within the National Wildlife Refuge System.”

When first established by President Theodore Roosevelt the sanctuaries were inviolate – no hunting or fishing allowed.

In recent years, however, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service has reneged on that founding principle by increasingly opening refuges to hunting. In some states, hunting is now permitted on all refuges. In fact, in many states, USFWS refuge web sites promote not only hunting but also recreational trapping. They do this despite the dwindling popularity of hunting and indications that the public is increasingly concerned about the humane treatment of wildlife. Sources: PEER, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Defenders of Wildlife, Humane Society of the United States

Friday, November 04, 2005

FRANCE: WHAT IS GOING ON?



There is surprisingly little analysis of the uprisings occurring now in France. Lots of news stories, little in depth reporting. Below is a sample of the little which I found available out there. Sorry, but I didn't take the time to space all the paragraphs like I usually do.



FROM: World Socialist Web Site

France: widening anti-police riots provoke government crisis
By Antoine Lerougetel
4 November 2005


Nightly riots and clashes in the Paris suburbs, between the police and youth mainly of North African and African descent, are entering their second week. A thousand police officers were deployed Wednesday night in Seine-Saint-Denis, northwest of Paris, and half of the department’s 40 towns were affected by violence. Shots have been fired at police officers, and one official spokesman described events as a descent into civil war.
The conflicts have provoked a severe crisis for the French government. Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has cancelled a scheduled visit to Canada, and Minister of the Interior Nicolas Sarkozy has pulled out of a visit to Afghanisan and Pakistan. Emergency meetings of the government of de Villepin and President Jacques Chirac have been held to discuss the situation.
The rioting began on the evening of October 27 after two youth were electrocuted when they climbed onto an electrical transformer while fleeing from the police. The deaths of the boys, in the northern suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois, sparked confrontations between youth and 400 to 500 riot police dispatched by Sarkozy. Violent protests and clashes with armed riot police have continued every night since and have spread to other working class suburbs.
The eruptions are the product of desperate poverty, mass unemployment and a vicious, openly racist law-and-order campaign spearheaded by Sarkozy, who has been considered the main rival to Chirac within the Gaullist Union for a Popular Party (UMP) and the leading contender to replace him in the next presidential election. Sarkozy has sent armed police into the immigrant slums and used terms such as “scum” and “gangrene” to describe their inhabitants.
On Wednesday, a council of ministers meeting was held, as well as a meeting of Gaullist deputies to the National Assembly. A question session was held in the National Assembly, at which Socialist Party and Communist Party deputies criticised Sarkozy, who sat mute. The deputies blamed him for instigating a social explosion through his law-and-order policies and provocative statements. De Villepin answered for him, trying to present a united government front. However, it was widely reported that deputies at the closed Gaullist meeting had heatedly attacked Sarkozy.
At the council of ministers, Chirac asked for a plan for urban renovation to be accelerated. He relieved Sarkozy of his responsibility for the preparation of the plan to prevent delinquency and entrusted it to de Villepin, who thereupon announced that he would be working for “equal opportunities” and “a plan of action” for youth employment in Seine-Saint-Denis, the department where Clichy and many other such communities are concentrated and the scene of a dozen outbreaks since October 27. De Villepin is Sarkozy’s most likely rival for the presidency in 2007.
The provocative language used by Sarkozy against the youth on suburban housing estates has been part of his attempt to mobilise a right-wing and racist movement under his leadership and that of the UMP. He hoped that this would not only secure his succession as president, but also provide popular support for the attacks on the working class required to break its resistance to the destruction of the welfare state and labour rights.
Since the beginning of the present government’s term of office in 2002, Sarkozy has led a drive to diminish the rights of defendants and extend police powers. He set up special brigades of police to send into troubled estates.
This has gone hand in hand with media campaigns demonising the immigrant youth and whipping up anti-Muslim sentiment, at the centre of which was legislation outlawing the wearing of the Muslim headscarf in state schools—a measure passed in 2004 with the support of virtually the entire political establishment, including the Socialist Party.
More than 20 years of austerity policies and accelerating attacks on workers’ living standards and rights by successive governments—those headed by the official “left” parties as well as those of the right wing—have stretched social tensions to the breaking point.
The chronic national 10 percent unemployment rate rises to well over 50 percent on many Parisian estates. The Gaullist government’s policy of encouraging job insecurity and short-term work contracts has been made more unbearable by savage cuts in benefits for the unemployed. Rises in gas and petrol prices have further increased the economic pressure on these communities.
The mass reaction on the night of the tragedy on the Chêne-Pointu estate has spilled over into many other estates in the Paris suburbs, in recent days involving small groups of youth burning vehicles and rubbish bins, attacking firemen attempting to extinguish the fires, and constantly clashing with the police.
The government fears that the Paris riots could spark broader upheavals all over France. Not only the towns in the Seine-Saint-Denis department have been affected, but also estates in the Val d’Oise and the Yvelines deparments of greater Paris.
Tensions were heightened still further when a tear gas canister was fired into a mosque on October 31. The following night, 1,250 cars were reported burned and at least one primary school was trashed.
Already, the Ousse des Bois estate in Pau, a thousand kilometres away near the Spanish border, has seen three continuous nights of clashes between youth and the police.
Despite the concern expressed within ruling circles, there is unanimity on the need for ever-greater repression to deal with the unrest. Minister for Social Cohesion Jean-Louis Borloo said the government had to react “firmly,” while UMP deputy Jacques Myard complained that the government had been weak because it had “accepted, step-by-step, that every night youths burn cars, destroy business and so on. Those guys will use the pretext of everything to riot, to demonstrate, to destroy.”
While making a show of criticising Sarkozy’s excesses and calling for the beefing up of social services cut by the government, all of the currents of the Socialist Party, the Greens and the Communist Party have called for the police to suppress the rioting.
Dominique Strauss Khan of the Socialist Party, a former minister in Lionel Jospin’s Plural Left government (1997-2002) and contender for the party’s nomination for the 2007 presidential election, stated on Europe 1 radio, “I utterly condemn the incidents at Clichy-sous-Bois. When it comes to law and order, an extremely firm attitude is required...repression and prevention should be employed.”
The Socialist Party and the Communist Party have presided over many of these municipalities for decades and maintained the peace for the French ruling class, while conditions have eroded. They are complicit in the austerity policies and the police build-up that underlie the explosion of anger among oppressed and impoverished youth that is now shaking France.

-----------------------------------------------
FROM: Alt. Muslim
Paris Is Burning: What's Religion Got To Do With It?


While religious ideology may have a role in other types of violence (i.e, al-Qaida), in this case it just happens to be the faith of the disenfranchised population.

By Shahed Amanullah, November 4, 2005


When the sun sets, the violence begins. Burning cars, balaclava-clad youth battling police (sometimes with real bullets), and an increasing sense of hopelessness cover neighborhoods long afflicted with high unemployment. It could be the West Bank, but this time the unrest is happening in the French working-class neighborhoods that are home to immigrant populations who have been excluded (or have excluded themselves, as some critics charge) from the relative affluence of French life. "The deep problem is the sentiment of exclusion from the social and economic game," explains Laurent Mucchielli, director of the Center for Sociological Research on Law and Penal Institutions near Paris. "The riots are of the same nature as in past years, which reminds us that the problems haven't been solved." While tensions in these areas have been simmering for years, the escalation into violence started when Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy visited the Clichy-sous-Bous region with media in tow, pledging a "war without mercy" on street crime (taking a page from the book of Ariel Sharon?). Local youths, who have long complained about being harassed by police, responded by pelting him with stones and bottles. Days later, when two immigrant youth fleeing a police identity check were electrocuted when hiding in a power relay station, the crowds grew more defiant. The next several days were followed by a series of escalations: police roundups, burnings of hundreds of cars, and the spreading of violence to other cities. Imams in the area had some success in calling for restraint among the Muslim population (urging, for example, that mothers keep their teenagers at home after sunset), but they lost control when a teargas grenade struck a mosque on Sunday. French politicians such as Interior Minister Dominque de Villepin appealed for calm (President Chirac didn't commment until the fighting was nearly a week old), but even de Villepin's valiant opposition of the Iraq war hasn't been able to give his pleas for calm more weight among France's restive Muslim populations. While right-wing politicians in France (most notably the Le Pen family and the National Front party) are using the riots to strengthen their anti-Muslim stances, the truth is that the reasons for the unrest are the same as those that caused riots in many Western cities over the past few decades. Poor or immigrant communities have not been successfully integrated into the larger society (and in this case, both French and immigrant societies share the blame), unemployment gives rise to crime that compounds the misery of the population, and mistrust between authorities and those in the ghettos snowballs into confrontation. While religious ideology may have a role in other types of violence (i.e, al-Qaida), in this case it just happens to be the faith of the disenfranchised population. Those seeking a solution to the problem would be more effective by looking deeper than that.

Shahed Amanullah is editor-in-chief of alt.muslim.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: Christian Science Monitor

Deep roots of Paris riots


President Chirac has called for dialogue after a week of clashes.
By Peter Ford | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
AULNAY-SOUS-BOIS, FRANCE - The fire engine and police sirens blaring through the darkness Wednesday night, as officers raced to put out yet another fire set by angry youths in this poor Paris suburb, signaled more than an immediate warning of danger.
After a week of nightly disturbances that have left hundreds of cars and buses torched, and several buildings burned down, the horns echoing off the concrete walls of grim housing projects sounded a broader alarm. The spreading violence has lifted the lid on an ugly stew of poverty, discrimination, and desperation amongst immigrant-descended families that most French citizens have long preferred to ignore.
"Frankly I am not surprised by what is happening," says Dounia Bouzar, an expert on French-born Muslims who has worked in the mostly black and North African districts on the outskirts of Paris. "Given the way these kids live, I wonder why it doesn't happen more often."
The outburst of violence, pitting youths throwing stones and Molotov cocktails against riot police, erupted after two teenagers in the nearby suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois - apparently hiding from the police - died by electrocution.
That incident, says social worker Michèle Lereste, "crystallized the hatred" that some of the most disaffected and hopeless young men living in what the government calls "sensitive urban zones" feel toward authority.
In these 751 zones that the government has designated for special programs, unemployment stands at 19.6 percent - double the national average - and at more than 30 percent among 21- to 29- year-olds, according to official figures. Incomes are 75 percent below the average.
Stung by charges that the government has mishandled the wave of unrest in a dozen suburbs, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin and Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy have both cancelled planned trips abroad. President Jacques Chirac called Wednesday for "dialogue" to cool tempers.
Mr. De Villepin and Mr. Sarkozy met Thursday to discuss ways of dampening the violence beyond deploying more riot police, which has been the government's approach so far. But after two decades of policies that have tried, and often failed, to strengthen schools, provide jobs, and improve housing, critics say it is time authorities took the problems more seriously.
The ugly, often poorly maintained blocks of public housing that have become a nightly battlefield are testament to 40 years of government policy that has concentrated immigrants and their families in well-defined districts away from city centers, as housing there became more expensive.
"Working class suburbs have become ethnic ghettos," says Marc Cheb Sun, who edits "Respect," a magazine aimed mostly at young black and North African readers. "That is the origin of the problem."
And it is not easy for even ambitious young people to break out if they come from a district with a bad reputation, as Jean-Francois Amadieu, a university professor who founded the "Discrimination Observatory" discovered in experiments over the past year.
He sent out fictitious applications for sales jobs, allegedly coming from six different sorts of applicant, ranging from a white male to a woman of North African origins, all with the same résumé.
Applicants writing from addresses known to be in "difficult" areas received half as many invitations to an interview as those from less notorious districts. The "North African" male candidate received five times fewer invitations than his white counterpart, says Prof. Amadieu.
At the same time, complains Michèle Lereste, who runs the "Green Light" social-work agency in Villetaneuse, just North of Paris, where the projects are almost entirely inhabited by immigrant-descended families, government funding cuts have closed a number of job-training institutes, "and we are finding it harder and harder to get employers to take apprentices from our district."
"The kids learn all the French republican values such as equality in school, and then they find in practice that it's an illusion," says Ms. Bouzar, who was recently named one of Time magazine's 50 "European Heroes" as a role model for those seeking to be good Muslims and good French citizens. "There is an enormous gap between theory and practice."
Nowhere is that gap clearer, say young men in Clichy-sous-Bois and adults who work with them, than in the behavior of the police. "They check our papers everywhere, all the time, for no reason," complains one youth in Clichy who did not want to be identified. "And the checks are getting rougher and rougher."
Those sorts of experiences "delegitimize the state" in young peoples' eyes, worries Bouzar, which helps explain why authority figures such as firemen and doctors have been stoned on recent nights even as they tried - with police protection - to save lives and property.
Taïb Ben Thabet, who has been a social worker in the projects north of Paris for 35 years, fears that the kind of discrimination his young wards face undermines his patient efforts to help them find their place in society.
"I teach them that the state is for everybody, that it treats everybody the same," he says. "But what credibility do I have when everything I say is contradicted by experience? The kids say it's all lies."
He is particularly upset by the manner in which Mr. Sarkozy referred to youths in the projects recently as "scum," pledging a "war without mercy" against them.
"We are giving power to the (Islamic) radicals," he argues. "When kids hear the minister call them scum, the obscurantists are there to take advantage of the way they feel."
"This is not just a problem for the kids in the projects," warns Mr. Cheb Sun. "Society created these ghettos and now it has to deal with them."
-------------------------------------------------------------------

FROM: French Press Agency (AFP)
What is behind the Paris riots? Organised gangs of criminals -- even Islamic radicals -- out to undermine the state, or a failure by successive governments to give millions of immigrants a chance in life?
Rampages that have gripped the poorer immigrant-populated outskirts of Paris since October 27, spreading for the first time Thursday night to other parts of the country, have left many in the country struggling for an explanation.
The rioters are young, overwhelmingly Muslim men, second-generation immigrants from France's former Arab and African colonies, who claim they are protesting economic misery, racial discrimination and provocative policing.
This argument has been widely echoed in the press, by Muslim and community representatives and by the left-wing opposition, which accuses the centre-right government of slashing budgets for social work in these communities.
Hardline new law-and-order policies implemented by Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy have also been widely accused of fuelling anger in the high-rise, mainly immigrant estates where the trouble has spread.
Sociologist Michel Wierviorka, speaking in Le Parisien newspaper, charged that Sarkozy had "stigmatised entire communities" by arguing that crime-ridden areas should be "cleaned with a power-hose".
But the interior minister -- while recognising more must be done to haul the suburbs out of poverty and exclusion -- insisted on Thursday the violence was being orchestrated by unknown ringleaders.
Police union leader Bruno Beschizza described the riots as "urban terrorism", led by small knots of criminals as well as Islamic radicals.
"This is a form of urban terrorism led by a minority of kingpins, who have a financial interest, such as drug trafficking, or an ideological one, such as Islamic radicals who have been seen by our colleagues."
These ringleaders were a "tiny minority", the head of the Synergie union said on Friday, adding his view was backed by a number of social workers and lawmakers in the worst-hit Seine-Saint-Denis region northeast of Paris.
The role -- if any -- of Islam in the recent upsurge in violence, which has affected mainly Muslim neighbourhoods, is a highly sensitive issue in France.
Paris Mayor Bertrand Delanoe, a Socialist, has warned against lumping together "a religion, Islam", with "a handful of extremists" and with "criminal networks".
In many cases Muslim community leaders have been acting as mediators between youths and the authorities, going door-to-door to talk to the families of young rioters, or stepping in at night to stop the clashes.
Most observers searching for the root causes of the riots accuse successive governments of turning a blind eye as immigrant ghettos, synonymous with unemployment and social deprivation, swelled outside France's big cities.
Today, some 750 areas are classed as "Sensitive Urban Zones" (ZUS), where unemployment hovers at 20 percent -- twice the national average -- and average incomes are 60 percent of the national average, government statistics show.
Among young men between 15 and 25, unemployment reaches 36 percent -- and even higher if only young Arab men are counted.
Youth violence -- with car-burnings a regular feature -- has been steadily building in these dilapidated estates, with major outbreaks of rioting around once a year and countless minor incidents which go unreported.
Sociologist Wieviorka said the riots stemmed from years of "broken promises" by the French state, and called into question the country's entire model for integrating newcomers into French society.
The French model, secular and republican, insists that all citizens are equal before the state, but has been accused of leaving cultural minorities without a voice, notably France's estimated five million Muslims.
"(These riots) demonstrate the failure of the so-called Republican model for social integration. We need to find something new, some combination of social solidarity and economic realism," Wieviorka said.
Le Figaro newspaper, in an editorial, said the run-down estates had "rotted" away to become "prisons" for the estimated five-million people who live there.
For the newspaper, the main culprit was French immigration policy since the 1970s, which had allowed family reunification but failed to provide sufficient mechanisms to integrate newcomers into society.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: International Herald Tribune
In Paris suburbs, anger won't cool
By Katrin Bennhold International Herald Tribune


CLICHY-SOUS-BOIS, France Talk to people outside the Bilal mosque in this rundown suburb north of Paris and they will tell you what has gone wrong: why rioters for the past week have confronted the police in overnight bursts of anger in the streets, torching cars, hurling rocks and even firing bullets in the worst civil disobedience in France in more than a decade.

Beyond the poverty and despair of life in the shoddy immigrant communities ringing the shining French capital, local Muslims say, there is no one left with any sway over the rioting youths. Parents, the police and the government have all lost touch, they say.

On Thursday, after rioters disregarded an appeal for calm by President Jacques Chirac, firing bullets at the police for the first time as the rioting spread for a seventh consecutive night, the government held emergency meetings throughout the day. But despite Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin's vow that "law and order will have the last word," the police were bracing for more violence as night fell.

In Clichy-sous-Bois on Thursday afternoon, outside the entrance of the Bilal mosque - a converted warehouse where a tear-gas grenade landed on Sunday, stoking fury against the police - celebrations of the end of the monthlong Ramadan fast were overshadowed by the widening disturbances.

Opinions about the riots among people gathered at the mosque differed, but everyone from the deputy imam to local council workers and men leaving the midday prayer agreed that the trouble has been compounded by a vacuum of moral authority.

"If you want authority over these kids you need their respect - but all the normal channels of authority lost their respect a long time ago," said Ali Aouad, 42, who has lived in this northeastern town for two decades. "They feel neglected by the government, and the police just provoke them."

Even the government's minister of equal opportunity, Azouz Begag, who himself grew up in an immigrant household outside Lyon, carries no authority here, residents said.

"Where has he been? He is representative of nothing and nobody," said a young man of Algerian descent, who identified himself only as H2B. "He has done nothing for us and now he is trying to compensate by criticizing Sarkozy," the French interior minister, "but it's too late."

The crisis has penetrated the top level of the French government, where Nicolas Sarkozy and Villepin, the two most senior ministers, are sparring over how to deal with the violence and have both come under fire for failing to bring the violence under control.

The trouble erupted in Clichy-sous-Bois on Oct. 27 after two teenagers, apparently thinking they were being pursued by the police, fled and were electrocuted when they hid in an electrical transformer. The disturbances have since spread to at least 20 neighboring towns.

In the early hours of Thursday, rioters torched 315 cars, burned a car dealership and a local supermarket, and attacked two commuter trains, the police said. Nine people were wounded.

But as appeals for calm by the government fell on deaf ears and a heavy police presence across the northern suburbs only appeared to provoke more violence, a number of local organizations seem to have quietly taken on the task of cooling tempers.

Abderamane Bouhout, president of the cultural organization that manages Bilal mosque, mobilized small groups of young believers during recent rioting to go between the rioters and the police and urge the disaffected youths to express their anger in nonviolent ways.

Aouad, who witnessed one such intervention on Monday night not far from the mosque, said it was impressively effective. "It worked," he said. "They went right between the two sides and a lot of the kids listened to them. The damage the next day was a lot less serious than the previous nights."

At the local city hall, Lamya Monkachi says the role of religious personalities along with that of young locals recruited from the suburbs to mediate for the city authorities has been key to reducing the violence in Clichy-sous-Bois in the past two days, even as it intensified in other suburbs. "What helped us here in Clichy to calm nerves was that we work a lot with people who know the local youths and speak their language," she said.

There are eight Muslim organizations in Clichy alone that have been mobilized to participate in starting a dialogue with the rioters. In addition, a group of youths, working closely with city hall, have formed an association in response to the riots last week called Beyond Words. Their representatives - young North African men dressed in white T-shirts with the names of the two dead teenagers printed on the back and the words "Dead for Nothing" on the front - have campaigned for peaceful dialogue.

But, says Marilou Jampolsky of SOS Racisme, a non-governmental organization fighting discrimination, the current government has made such informal mediation efforts more difficult by cutting back public funding for them.

"The number of neighborhood organizations that organize sports, help with school work and just generally check up on these kids has significantly declined since this government came to power" in 2002, she said. SOS Racisme, which also has local branches in suburbs, has lost half its money, she said.

One of the most prominent young mediators is Samir Mihi, 28, who has become an informal spokesman for the various groups that have stepped in to calm the violence and mediated between the rioters and the government.

According to Mihi, who grew up in Clichy, the key ingredient for restoring peace in this and other suburbs is to build relationships with the local youths and give them the feeling that their concerns are being heard.

"If they listen to us it is because we give them what they most want: respect," said Mihi, who organizes sports activities for teenagers at city hall. "If you respect them, they respect you."

One reason politicians fail to make themselves heard in the suburbs is that successive governments have failed to tackle disproportionately high unemployment and crime rates in the suburban housing projects, leaving youth with few opportunities. That feeling of exclusion is exacerbated by a lack of political representatives of North African origin and other role models, Mihi said.

The lack of moral authority is perhaps most flagrant with the police, locals said, because the interaction between officers and residents is often reduced to frequent and random identity checks that are perceived to be humiliating in the mainly North African communities in the suburbs.

At the local market, Muhammad, 24, who declined to give his last name, said such checks sometimes happen even outside his own apartment. He recounted how the police stopped him as he was walking home the night before.

"They grabbed me and touched my hood to see if it was hot or sweaty," he said, describing what he called a regular practice. "If you're caught with a sweaty hood, it means you've been running and that you have probably committed a crime."

Meanwhile, the parents of the teenagers in question lack authority because poverty has often made family life more difficult, says Jampolsky. Neither do they share the quest for identity so prevalent among the younger generation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FROM: Open Democracy

Paris in flames: the limits of repression
Patrice de Beer



Nicolas Sarkozy’s hardline, zero-tolerance – and pre-election – rhetoric is foundering on France’s intractable urban realities, reports Patrice de Beer.

A week after the riots in the Lozells area of Birmingham, England, between people of African-Caribbean descent and those of Asian origin, the northeast Paris banlieues (suburbs) of Clichy-sous-Bois and Montfermeil exploded in violent confrontation between police and black and Beurs (north African) youths. There have been clashes for six nights in a row – extending on the night of 1-2 November to the suburb of Aulnay-sous-Bois. They involve the stoning of police vans, the burning of dozens of cars, attacks on firemen, and the vandalising of a police station, a post office, and a city hall. The disturbances have gone as far as a bullet being fired at a police van and a tear-gas canister being thrown at a local mosque during evening prayers – in the midst of the Muslim fasting month, Ramadan.

As in Birmingham, rumour was at the heart of the unfolding events. On 27 October, two teenagers – Ziad Benna and Bouna Traore, sons of working-class African Muslim immigrants – were electrocuted while hiding in an electric substation. The circumstances of the incident are contested; it was quickly alleged – though by politicians rather than police, who strenuously deny the claim – that they had tried to escape a police check.
This is not the first racial riot – and it certainly won’t be the last – in the suburban ghettoes of France or other European countries. Youth violence, and more particularly violence in immigrant communities – legal or illegal, involving French citizens or not – has been here for a long time, and seems here to stay. Nicolas Sarkozy, the French interior minister and candidate to succeed president Jacques Chirac at the Elysée palace in 2007 – the two men hate each other despite belonging to the same UMP party – has adopted a repressive, law-and-order, zero-tolerance strategy towards the banlieues.
The rhetoric is as polarising as it is simple: it threatens evildoers (“them”) with jail sentences if they dare threaten the law-abiding citizens (“us”). Until now, this hyper-mediatic policy has paid off, helping make “Sarko” – himself the son of an Hungarian immigrant – one of the most popular politicians in France.
But today, in a tense situation of racial unrest, unemployment, loss of faith in politics and a bitter pre-presidential fight within the Union pour un Movement Populaire (UMP) as well as the Socialist party, Sarkozy’s strategy is losing steam. Crime may be down statistically , but it remains as visible as ever, and only a third of physical assaults are recorded. The number of cars burned might be down, but the vehicles look as disturbing as ever on a TV screen. Daily “misbehaviour” – the politically-correct word for petty violence – might be unacceptable to many, but the cowboy-like behaviour of police launching armed operations in banlieues look no more acceptable, especially if they prove ineffective; or when they go too far, like firing tear-gas at a mosque.
It seems more obvious than ever that violence attracts more violence, and that it becomes a vicious circle where violent police repression of local riots nurtures even more violence and in turn even more repression. It is true that, in the banlieues as in the more affluent inner cities, people fear petty crime, drug-peddling, and carjacking by jobless youngsters. But nor do they like being fingered by police and politicians as potential criminals because of their appearance or creed. The only Beur member of government, Azouz Begag, “minister for social promotion and equality of opportunity”, criticised Sarko for his provocative words: “You must not call youngsters ‘scum’, tell them that you’re going to hit them hard. You must try to appease the situation,” he said, adding “I use the verb ‘clean up’ for my shoes or my car, not for neighbourhoods”.
Repression has shown its limits. Not that it is useless or harmful, as any government has to protect its citizens against crime. But a repressive policy cannot compensate for racial and social integration, nor offer an answer to discrimination, the housing problems of ghettoised suburbs and (above all) to the unemployment which hits the immigrant population even harder than the majority of job-seekers. Histrionic posturing to attract voters in pre-electoral times can cause more harm than good especially when the very social structure of France is at stake.

GO TO http://sketchythoughts.blogspot.com/
TO SEE A SITE WITH MORE INTERESTING ARTICLES AND ANALYSIS WHICH WAS JUST SENT TO ME FROM AN OREAD DAILY READER....

RESTRICTIONS ON GERRY ADAMS VISA TO US WOULD BE MISGUIDED


(Note: I guess there may be a post now and then after all with regular OD coming back Monday)

From Sinn Fein News

An Irish Times report Wednesday morning quoted US State Department sources saying that the US Administration is planning to place a restriction on Gerry Adams visa and ban him from speaking at fundraising events in the United States. Sinn Féin's Chief Negotiator Martin McGuinness has described such a move as "wholly negative" and said it will "be used by anti-agreement unionists, including the DUP, to undermine the progress that has been made this year and damage the hopes for progress in the months ahead. It is important that this matter is resolved as speedily as possible".

Mr. McGuinness said:

"These fundraising events allow supporters of Irish unity to contribute to Sinn Féin's political programme to achieve this through peaceful and democratic activity. Such support is entirely legitimate and indeed necessary in demonstrating that politics works.

"The US has played a pivotal role in the creation and evolution of the peace process. An even handed approach has been the hallmark of success in this. All parties have been treated equally. However any heavy handed attempt by the State Department to try and dictate Sinn Féin policy on policing is misguided and will do nothing to help in the resolution of this key issue.

"Sinn Féin knows what we have to do on policing, our position is very clear. The British Government also knows what it has to do on policing. It has given a series of commitments on this. The upcoming period will provide ample opportunities to establish whether these commitments have been honoured. President Bush's special envoy Mitchell Reiss knows this and he and the State Department have been fully briefed on our party's position.

"If Gerry Adams has restrictions imposed on his visa this means you would have the ludicrous and unsustainable situation where he is allowed to travel to the US, but he would be banned from attending the fundraising event which will go ahead in any event.

"If Gerry Adams is banned from addressing US citizens at fundraising events next week he will not travel to the United States. Of course he and others in the Sinn Féin leadership will continue to engage with US opinion and he will travel there as part of that engagement in the time ahead.

"The adoption of this position by the US Administration would cause huge anger among supporters of the peace process in Irish America especially and is out of step with, for example the British governments approach. There is no ban on Gerry Adams attending fundraising events in Britain.

"Inevitably, such a wholly negative approach by the US would have serious political repercussions and would be used by anti-agreement unionists, including the DUP, to undermine the progress that has been made this year and damage the hopes for progress in the months ahead. It is important that this matter is resolved as speedily as possible."

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

PAUSE


No more Oread Daily until next Monday. Must be time to clean the presses...

RIGHT WING JUDICIAL ACTIVISM



I don't know about you but I always get a kick llistening to right wingers complain about the judicial activism of "liberal" judges. I mean really, the complaint of the right is that the supposed judges of the left, don't happen to rule the way they like. Their judges just interpret the constitution. They don't try to make law. Yeah, and the Yankees don't try to buy pennants either.

Anyway, the following article by Michael Parenti taken from Political Affairs Magazine I think pretty well shatters the myth of the "strict constructionist."


Right-Wing Judicial Activism

Appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee as nominee for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts assured the senators that he would not be one of those noisome activist judges who inject their personal values into court decisions.

He would behave like "an umpire calling balls and strikes." With a completely open mind, he would judge each case solely on its own merits, with only the Constitution to guide him, he said.

None of the senators doubled over with laughter.

A fortnight later, while George Bush was introducing another Court nominee---his right-wing Jesus-freak crony Harriet Miers---he prattled on about his "judicial philosophy" and how he wanted jurists to be "strict constructionists" who cleave close to the Constitution, as opposed to loose constructionist liberals who use the Court to advance their ideological agenda.

It is time to inject some reality into this issue. In fact, through most of its history the Supreme Court has engaged in the wildest conservative judicial activism in defense of privileged groups.

Be it for slavery or segregation, child labor or the sixteen-hour workday, state sedition laws or assaults on the First Amendment---rightist judicial activists have shown an infernal agility in stretching and bending the Constitution to serve every inequity and iniquity.

Right to the eve of the Civil War, for instance, the Supreme Court asserted the primacy of property rights in slaves, rejecting all slave petitions for freedom. In the famous Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the Court concluded that, be they slave or free, Blacks were a "subordinate and inferior class of beings" without constitutional rights.

Thus did reactionary judicial activists---some of them slaveholders---spin racist precepts out of thin air to lend a constitutional gloss to their beloved slavocracy.

When the federal government wanted to establish national banks, or give away half the country to speculators, or subsidize industries, or set up commissions that fixed prices and interest rates for large manufacturers and banks, or imprison dissenters who denounced war and capitalism, or use the U.S. Army to shoot workers and break strikes, or have Marines kill people in Central America---the Supreme Court’s conservative activists twisted the Constitution in every conceivable way to justify these acts. So much for "strict construction."

But when the federal or state governments sought to limit workday hours, set minimum wage or occupational safety standards, ensure the safety of consumer products, or guarantee the right of collective bargaining, then the Court ruled that ours was a limited form of government that could not tamper with property rights and could not deprive owner and worker of "freedom of contract."

The Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in 1868 ostensibly to establish full citizenship for African Americans, says that no state can "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," nor deny any person "equal protection of the laws."

In another act of pure judicial invention, a conservative dominated Court decided that "person" really meant "corporation"; therefore the Fourteenth Amendment protected business conglomerates from regulation by the states.



To this day, corporations have legal standing as "persons" thanks to conservative judicial activism.

By 1920, pro-business federal courts had struck down roughly three hundred labor laws passed by state legislatures to ease inhumane working conditions.

Between 1880 and 1931 the courts issued more than 1,800 injunctions to suppress labor strikes. No trace of conservative restraint during those many years.

When Congress outlawed child labor or passed other social reforms, conservative jurists declared such laws to be violations of the Tenth Amendment. The Tenth Amendment says that powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people. So Congress could not act.

But, when states passed social-welfare legislation, the Court’s right-wing activists said such laws violated "substantive due process" (a totally fabricated oxymoron) under the Fourteenth Amendment. So the state legislatures could not act.

Thus for more than fifty years, the justices used the Tenth Amendment to stop federal reforms initiated under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Fourteenth to stymie state reforms initiated under the Tenth. It’s hard to get more brazenly activist than that.

A conservative Supreme Court produced Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), another inventive reading of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause. Plessy confected the "separate but equal" doctrine, claiming that the forced separation of Blacks from Whites did not impute inferiority as long as facilities were equal (which they rarely were). For some seventy years, this judicial fabrication buttressed racial segregation.

Convinced that they too were persons, women began to argue that the "due process" clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment (applying to state governments) and the Fifth Amendment (applying to the federal government) disallowed the voting prohibitions imposed on women by state and federal authorities.

But in Minor v. Happersett (1875), the conservative Court fashioned another devilishly contorted interpretation: true, women were citizens but citizenship did not necessarily confer a citizen’s right to suffrage. In other words, "due process," and "equal protection" applied to such "persons" as business corporations but not to women or people of African descent.

At times, presidents place themselves and their associates above accountability by claiming that the separation of powers gives them an inherent right of "executive privilege." Executive privilege has been used by the White House to withhold information on undeclared wars, illegal campaign funds, Supreme Court nominations, burglaries (Watergate), insider trading (by Bush and Cheney), and White House collusion with corporate lobbyists.

But the concept of executive privilege (i.e. unaccountable executive secrecy) exists nowhere in the Constitution or any law. Yet the wild-eyed right-wing activists on the Supreme Court trumpet executive privilege, deciding out of thin air that a "presumptive privilege" for withholding information belongs to the president.

Bush just recently talked about "how important it is for us to guard executive privilege in order for there to be crisp decision making in the White House." Crisp? So Bush presents himself as a "strict constructionist" while making claim to a wholly extra-constitutional juridical fiction known as "executive privilege."

With staggering audacity, the Court’s rightist judicial activists have decided that states cannot prohibit corporations from spending unlimited amounts on public referenda or other elections because such campaign expenditures are a form of "speech" and the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech to such "persons" as corporations.

In a dissenting opinion, the liberal Justice Stevens noted, "Money is property; it is not speech." But his conservative colleagues preferred the more fanciful activist interpretation.

They further ruled that "free speech" enables rich candidates to spend as much as they want on their own campaigns, and rich individuals to expend unlimited sums in any election contest. Thus poor and rich can both freely compete, one in a whisper, the other in a roar.

Right-wing judicial activism reached a frenzy point in George W. Bush v. Al Gore. In a 5-to-4 decision, the conservatives overruled the Florida Supreme Court’s order for a recount in the 2000 presidential election. The justices argued with breathtaking contrivance that since different Florida counties might use different modes of tabulating ballots, a hand recount would violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

By preventing a recount, the Supreme Court gave the presidency to Bush.

In recent years these same conservative justices have held that the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause could not be used to stop violence against women, or provide a more equitable mode of property taxes, or a more equitable distribution of funds between rich and poor school districts.

But, in Bush v. Gore they ruled that the equal protection clause could be used to stop a perfectly legal ballot recount. Then they explicitly declared that the Bush case could not be considered a precedent for other equal protection issues. In other words, the Fourteenth Amendment applied only when the conservative judicial activists wanted it to, as when stealing an election.

We hear conservatives say that judges should not try to "legislate from the bench," the way liberal jurists supposedly do. But a recent study by Paul Gewirtz and Chad Golder of Yale University reveals that conservative justices like Thomas and Scalia have a far higher rate of invalidating or reinterpreting Congressional laws than more liberal justices like Byers and Ginsberg.

By this measure, too, the conservatives are the more activist.

In sum, the right-wing aggrandizers in black robes are neither strict constructionists nor balanced adjudicators. They are unrestrained power hustlers masquerading as sober defenders of lawful procedure and constitutional intent.

If this is democracy, who needs oligarchy?

--Michael Parenti's recent books include Superpatriotism (City
Lights), The Assassination of Julius Caesar (New
Press), and The Culture Struggle (Seven Stories Press), all available in paperback; also visit: www.michaelparenti.org.

WATER SHORTAGE HITS AUSTRALIA'S PALM ISLAND - GOVENEMENT SAYS "NOT TO WORRY"


This is one of those out of the way stories I run across from time to time. I don’t have a total handle on what is going on here, but I can tell something sure is.

In Australia, the Queensland government has refused a request from Palm Island council to close the Indigenous community to visitors because of a severe water shortage. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Policy Minister John Mickel says the water shortage is being addressed by a number of government departments. He says an extra plumber will ensure that no water is wasted. Mickel said the Government would supply fresh water at cost price. "I'm advised now that supplies of fresh water will be available at the retail store and that will be available at cost for the islanders," he said.

Palm Island's mayor Erykah Kyle had asked the government to close the island to visitors, including the 10 public servants who travel there each day – and who use the island’s water. She said water supplies on the island were unlikely to last much more than a month unless it rained. The Government declined.

The water shortage affecting the small island is so sever that its Aboriginal residents are suffering hygiene problems such as an outbreak of boils, Red Cross workers said. A Red Cross spokesman said the relief agency hoped to supply the island's residents with much-needed drinking water within days. The spokesman said some residents were suffering so badly plans were underway to bring them to the mainland. "Red Cross workers on Palm Island have told us that there has been an outbreak of boils over there – we haven't got the extent of that," he told ABC radio. "But clearly that relates to issues of hygiene and a lack of water and I understand that they're making arrangements for a number of people to move over to the mainland so it is a very serious situation."

Mayor Kyle says hygiene is not the problem. The quality of the limited water available might be.

The residents of Palm Island want an evacuation plan to be drawn up as the north Queensland island's water crisis worsens. The Government says that, too, isn’t necessary.

A former water department supervisor on Palm Island says residents are angry that they were not told sooner about water shortages. Jacob Baira says staff should have been monitoring the water levels and making regular reports. "My concern is for the people of Palm [Island] at the present moment.”

"It's unbelievable,” Baria said, “that you get down to one month's supply of water and then they tell you. It's not good enough." Baira says he is concerned for the welfare of his wife and 11 children.

Baria asked, "Where are we going to go, are we going to start digging wells? We haven't been told that yet," he said. "Whether we're going to be evacuated or how we're going to get our water in the next couple of weeks, this might turn into a real concern then. If it doesn't rain, it's going to drive people to panic."

Mayor Kyle told The Australian if island residents had to be evacuated there would be problems finding temporary accommodation for them. "We have older people here that would be difficult to move," she said. "But it doesn't matter -- young and old, they would be saying, 'We have nowhere to go, we don't have any money'."

Palm Island was the scene of a major uprising following the death in late 2004 of a young aboriginal man in police custody.

Originally used by early European settlers as a leper colony, Palm Island is now home to 4000 Indigenous Australians, making it the largest Aboriginal community in Australia. The Aboriginal settlement on Palm Island was set up in 1918 by the government in Queensland after a cyclone had devastated another state-run institution near the town of Innisfail on the mainland. Over the years, hundreds of Aborigines were sent to live on the island, which is part of a small archipelago. The practice continued until the late 1960s. The Palm Island settlement became an all-purpose repository for Aborigines. It served as a detention camp, an old people's home and a centre for the mentally ill.

The community, deriving from about 42 mainland tribes, has an unemployment rate of 90% and an average life expectancy of 50 years, thirty less than the national average. Many of its residents suffer from substance abuse. Mayor Kyle says it is not unusual on the island to have up to 20 people living in a three-bedroom house.

Criminologist Professor Paul Wilson from Australia's Bond University, who has closely studied the island, told the BBC that these problems were caused by the repression of the past. "This history of how white colonizers have treated black people on this island is appalling and we are seeing now the result of that legacy," he said.

Got that right, dude.

In fact, it wasn’t until the 1971 that it seemed the outside world took notice that Palm Island really was an Aboriginal reserve run like a jail. Its inmates had committed no crimes but were forbidden to leave. Young people could only marry with the consent of the superintendent. No one could own property.Keith Windschuttle, conservative Australian historian and journalist wrote, "Palm Island breached almost every known principle of human rights and freedom. It was far worse than anything the American Civil Rights Movement had exposed in the USA. It was legalized white racism. It was part of the policy of separatism that underlay the Aboriginal reserves.”

And now, the enlightened government of Australia is ready to send in a plumber and to sell the “locals” some bottled water for their troubles.

Gee, thanks. Sources: National Indigenous Times (Australia) Advertiser (Adelaide), The Australian, Australia Broadcasting Corporation, Wikipedia, BBC, European Network for Indigenous Australian Rights, Bennelong Society

MURDER GANG STANDS DOWN IN NORTHERN IRELAND


The brutal sectarian murder gang, the Loyalist Volunteer Force (LVF) announced on Sunday that it was standing down all its units following the announcement of an end to its summer feud with the rival UVF. During its nine-year existence the LVF was involved in sectarian murder and drug dealing. Ten of its members were killed as a result of feuds with other unionist paramilitaries.

The LVF has been blamed for more than a dozen sectarian killings since it was founded in mid-Ulster in 1996. The LVF was formed by Portadown loyalist Billy Wright after the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) leadership stood down his unit in 1996.

Wright was shot dead in the Maze prison in December 1997.

Sinn Féin Assembly member Gerry Kelly said: "Given the LVF's history, nationalists and republicans will of course be cautious of anything being said or promised by them." He added: "This grouping has a history of sectarian violence, murders and widespread drug dealing, so with relation to the LVF, it is very much wait and see."

Some just aren't buying it.

Terry Enright, whose son Terry Enright Junior was murdered by the LVF outside a Belfast night-club in 1997, said he would take a lot more convincing. "The LVF is a gang of criminals that tried to cover up its activities by carrying out sectarian murders," Enright said. "It is going to have to prove it is serious by decommissioning."

Loughgiel Sinn Féin Councilor, Anita Cavlan pointed out, “After the IRA statement in July the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) insisted on there being a long period to ‘assess’ the historic move in an effort to try and stall the process. But when it comes to the LVF however, a group that has not only been murdering innocent Catholics but has been involved in ruining young Protestant lives through the distribution of illegal drugs, it has only taken the DUP one day to assess their move as being genuine!!”

Jeffrey Donaldson, of the Democratic Unionist Party, said: "If we are to have any real hope of lasting peace, then all of the paramilitary groups must end their violent crime for good and also deal emphatically with the issue of illegal weapons."

Sinn Fein's Kelly said: "The LVF is a small part of the unionist paramilitary problem. The larger organizations the UVF and UDA have been involved in the summer months in ongoing violence and attacks on Catholics especially in areas like North Antrim. These campaigns need to end."

When the LVF announced that its members would be stood down from midnight on Sunday, it said the move was in response to the IRA's decision to disarm and it was not "leaving the stage from a position of weakness or under threat".

According to a source cited by the Guardian, the LVF leadership secured its arms before ordering members to stand down. The group, which handed over some weapons in 1998 in order for members to qualify for early release from the Maze prison, might now consider disposing of the rest through the decommissioning body led by General John De Chastelain. "They're going to have that debate now," the source said.

Michael McGoldrick (63), from Craigavon, Co Armagh, whose Catholic taxi driver son Michael was murdered in July 1996, believes the commitment by the paramilitary group to stand down marks a significant step forward in the peace process.

His son, a married 31-year-old father-of-one, was killed during the Drumcree protest by renegade members of the UVF who formed the LVF.

McGoldrick yesterday said he hoped the weekend announcement marked a final chapter in the group's history.

"I am very glad that they have stood down and I would be glad if all paramilitary groups stood down," he told the Belfast Telegraph. "I can only hope that it is genuine and I think this is a wonderful opportunity for the politicians to get together and make Northern Ireland a better community for all, I think that is important for everyone.

"I am happy because I see this as a positive step in the right direction towards taking all guns away."

"I would say that there are a lot of people imprisoned that, had it not been for the Troubles, would never have seen the inside of a prison," McGoldrick added.

"I never wanted revenge, not even justice; all I wanted was for it to stop."

Footnotes

Loyalist Volunteer Force
Volatile loyalist paramilitary splinter group formed in 1996. Behind more than 15 murders

Ulster Volunteer Force
Loyalist paramilitary group formed in 1966 to combat nationalists. Responsible for more than 500 deaths

Ulster Defense Association
Biggest loyalist paramilitary organization in Northern Ireland, it was banned in 1992. Estimated to have killed more than 400 people


Sources: Guardian, Sinn Fein News, Release, Belfast Telegraph