Wednesday, September 15, 2010

REAL IRA THREATENS BRITISH BANKING INDUSTRY












The guerilla group, the Real IRA (RIRA) has threatened to attack the British banking inustry.  The question  is can they actually do it.  Some say the group is little more than a rag tag operation of Northern Irish dissidents.  Others give it more credence than that.

The group has set off bombs in London before including attacks at MI5 headquarters, and the BBC.

The Real IRA (RIRA), also known as Óglaigh na hÉireann, is a socialist republican guerilla group that was formed by hardliners who broke out of the provisional IRA when it was clear that the provisionals would go along with the good Friday agreement and subsequently call a ceasefire with the northern Ireland Unionists.  The group believes  "that Ireland should be ruled by the Irish and that the only way to acheive that end is through armed struggle. 

In answer to querstions from a Derry based news station in 2003, the group wrote,”We remain convinced that no just and final political settlement can be arrived at between the Irish people and the people of Britain and between the Nationalist and the Unionist communities until the British military and political presence is totally removed from the equation. It is also important to point out that the political package enshrined in the Belfast agreement had to be acceptable to and ratified by an external political power i.e. the British Government before it was even presented to the Irish people. We regard this as a blatant usurpation of the right of the Irish people to self-determination.”



In their New Year's statement this year, they wrote, ""The Irish Republican Army will continue to carry out armed attacks against the British military and political apparatus in Ireland and those who assist in anyway their illegal occupation."  The RIRA statement also claimed British intelligence were behind a series of sectarian attacks which have been blamed on republicans. "The last year has seen a marked increase in the activities of MI5 inspired counter gangs masquerading as republicans, these gangs will be seen for what they are by the republican base and their attempts to bring the republican movement into disrepute will not be tolerated. It is also clear that such groups are behind an increase in sectarian attacks across the six counties, sectarianism is anathema to republicanism and serves the interests of British imperialism in Ireland, not the republican position."

On august 15 1998 a bomb detonated in the city center of the Northern Irish town of Omagh. 29 people were killed and 100-300 people were injured (reports vary). The devastating attack was probably a mistake, the target for the bombs was probably supposed to be the courthouse of Omaha targeted as a symbolic target. The courthouse is an economic, administrative, legal, and military center and an attack against it could be identified as an attack on the British presence and rule as a whole.  The attack cost RIRA a great deal of popular support.  Just about every time they are mentioned by the police or the British that bomb attack is brought up still.

The web site Oslaish Na Heiream writes of the bombing, "Another republican group, which did not come forward, is also thought to have had a role in the operation; and the Royal Ulster Constabulary is suspected of collusion.  Although three warnings were issued and the location given, video footage of the incident shows the RUC moving people into rather than away from the danger, thus killing 29 people and injuring hundreds."



RIRA claims now to be growing fast.  It is believed that their main support base is believed to be north Louth and South Armagh.


MI5 apparently takes the group, and other dissidents seriously.  The Derry Jouranl reported two weeks ago "MI5 has been redirecting some its resources away from investigations into Al-Qaeda towards tracking the Continuity IRA, the Real IRA and Óglaigh na hÉireann, according to the English papers."




The Belfast Telegraph reported last month that the group was believed to be raising money by extorting drug dealers in Dublin and Cork.  


One element in the Real IRA's recent activity has been a wave of so-called "punishment" shootings and beatings of those they deem "antisocial elements" in nationalist working class areas.  "These actions are taken as a last resort to protect the community. We are an integral part of the community and the people in them are our eyes and ears. The fact is that the British police force is rejected by republican communities and people naturally turn to us for help.
"The vast majority of issues are resolved by negotiation, a small percentage require more direct forms of intervention including punishment shootings and expulsions," they said.


The threat against the British banking system is the first time the Real IRA has engaged in such open anti-capitalist rhetoric or focused on the role of the banking system.
The leaders also threatened to intensify the group's terror campaign on all fronts.
"Realistically, it is important to acknowledge that we have regrouped and reorganised and emerged from a turbulent period in republican history.
"We have already shown our capacity to launch attacks on the British military, judicial, and policing infrastructure. As we rebuild, we are confident that we will increase the volume and effectiveness of attacks," the organisation said.
The 32 County Sovereignty Committee shares the same political philosophy of the Real IRA, although its member deny being the groups political wing.  Late last month Gary Donnelly ,a member of the 32 County Sovereignty Movement, wasaccused of committing an offence under terrorism legislation.
Gary Donnelly, 39, of Sackville Court, is charged with possessing a mobile phone in such circumstances to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that it was to be used for terrorism.  Donnelly labeled the charges rediculous.  He said, "I am being set up for my political beliefs."  As he was being charged at the Londonderry courthouse protesters gathered outside and clashed with police.

The following article is from  the Londonderry Sentinel.

REAL IRA BNAKER THREAT DELIVERED IN NORTH WEST LOO





A REAL IRA statement that it has regrouped and is planning attacks on bankers and financial institutions was delivered in a Godfather-like encounter in the public toilet of a premises on the Londonderry/Donegal/Tyrone border.
Veteran Belfast journalist Henry McDonald was instructed to travel to the North West after making contact with republican intermediaries in a bid to secure a response from the Real IRA to a list of questions posed on behalf of the Guardian newspaper.

According to Mr McDonald he was summonsed to a location near the border and told to go into the public toilet and reach behind the cistern where he found a USB key inside a surgical glove.
Therein was a detailed response to a list of questions he had put to the Real IRA from its national leadership.

Amongst the startling claims was a statement of intent to pursue a violent anti-capitalist agenda, through which banks and financial institutions would be targetted.

The statement read: "We have a track record of attacking high-profile economic targets and financial institutions such as the City of London. 

"The role of bankers and the institutions they serve in financing Britain's colonial and capitalist system has not gone unnoticed.

"Let's not forget that the bankers are the next-door neighbours of the politicians. Most people can see the picture: the bankers grease the politicians' palms, the politicians bail out the bankers with public funds, the bankers pay themselves fat bonuses and loan the money back to the public with interest. 

"It's essentially a crime spree that benefits a social elite at the expense of many millions of victims."

The group also claimed to have regrouped following a "turbulent period in republican history."

It claimed: "We have already shown our capacity to launch attacks on the British military, judicial, and policing infrastructure. As we rebuild, we are confident that we will increase the volume and effectiveness of attacks."

It also pointed to the replacement of the army's Operation Banner by Operation Helvetic and suggested republican communities were being victimised in Northern Ireland.

"From the point of view of republican communities, there is still a heavily armed British police force that casually uses plastic baton rounds, CS gas and Tasers, carry out house raids, stop and search operations and general harassment.

"There's still a 5,000-strong British army garrison, a new MI5 HQ in Belfast, and a British secretary of state. 

"Republican communities are still subjected to sectarian parades and the right to protest is being met with intimidation and violence."
The organisation also said it would be willing to talk if the ending of the "illegal British occupation of Ireland" was on the agenda.

"The IRA is not unwilling to talk, in fact there needs to be talks … however, talks need to deal with the root cause of the conflict, namely the illegal British occupation of Ireland," it stated.

"We are mindful, though, that the history of such approaches from the British has been characterised by a lack of integrity, a lack of willingness to address the causes of conflict, and has been motivated by a self-serving agenda," it added.

As has now become customary the Real IRA also attacked Sinn Féin Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness as a manager of British rule.

"Martin McGuinness is a British Crown minister who has a vested interest in causing mischief among republicans.
"His job is to administer the Queen of England's writ in Ireland...However, if he has any evidence to back up his claims, he should make it public," the Real IRA said.


Tuesday, September 14, 2010

UN TELLS AMERICAN INDIANS THEY MIGHT HAVE SOME INPUT ON US HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT, MAYBE, IN FOUR MORE YEARS







Back in late August the Obama Administration submitted a report in response to a 2006 United Nations directive that all of its member nations submit reports every four years on the state of human rights within their borders.  The document will formerly be submitted in November. 


 Defenders Online reports that the ACLU praised the report for “correctly acknowledging the need for improvement in several key areas, including racial justice, women’s rights, LGBT rights and discrimination against Muslims and Americans of South Asian and Arab descent.” But it went on to assert that it failed to present “a full picture of the state of human rights in the U.S., [and] neglects to address other key areas … including felon disenfranchisement, inhuman prison conditions, racial disparities in the death penalty system and deaths and abuse in immigration detention.”


The report is pretty lame.  Basically, It is a summary of Obama administration programs, initiatives and plans.


But there is more.


Native Americans who say they were either uninformed about the process and their right to comment, or who were just ignored have now been told by the U.N. they'll have to wait another four years to have any say...if then.


Consequently you could say the report and the process are just one more human rights abuse.


The following is from Censored News: Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights News Publisher.


UN: TOO LATE TO COMMENT ON US HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES


Native Americans who were never informed, or ignored, will have to wait another four years to report US human rights abuses to UN in Periodic Report 

By Brenda Norrell
Censored News
http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com
Photo: Navajos remember the 1979 Church Rock NM uranium spill and legacy of death from uranium mining on Navajo Nation. Photo 2010: Garrett Brennan Stewart, Navajo.
.
The United Nations Human Rights Council says it is too late to comment on the United States' human rights record, as presented in the US State Department's Periodic Review.

In a response today to Censored News, the UN says the deadline has passed. All of those Native American individuals and organizations, who were never informed, or who were ignored in the Listening Sessions in the final report, will have no chance to offer testimony on US human rights abuses.

This reveals that the process, undertaken by the US State Department, was a human rights abuse in itself.

The next report will be in four years.

Although the US State Department held "Listening Sessions," around the country, almost all of the Native American testimony was ignored in the final 29-page Universal Periodic Review Report to the UN.

The US State Department held a Listening Conference in Window Rock, Arizona, on the Navajo Nation. However, in its final report, there is no mention of Navajos, Navajo deaths from uranium mining, respiratory diseases resulting from decades of coal mining and power plants on the Navajo Nation,or the relocation of 14,000 Navajos from their homes to make way for Peabody Coal mining on Black Mesa.

Some important statements were included in a separate human rights report. Those organizations connected with the US Human Rights Network were able to submit statements as members of the "civil society" in a 423-page report.

However, other Native people were either never informed, or ignored in the Listening Conferences. Indigenous Peoples at the southern and northern borders, struggling for their rights of passage, battling Border Patrol abuse, and the human rights abuses carried out by their own elected tribal governments, are among those who were left out of the process.

The US State Department's watered-down summaries of those Listening Conferences, which are posted online but not included in the final report, are a dismal effort that ignores key names and issues. These summaries expose the United States' lack of concern with the human rights of Native Americans in the US.
--Brenda Norrell, Censored News
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Secretariat of the Human Rights CouncilUPRsubmissions@ohchr.org
Dear Mrs. Norrell,
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights wants to inform your office that the deadline for submissions of stakeholders in relation to countries scheduled to be reviewed at the 9th session of the Universal Periodic Review Working Group (November / 2010) has now passed. The Summary of stakeholders information has been finished and posted in our web page. Consequently, please note that we can not accept any other submission for the 9th session.
For information regarding the Universal Periodic Review mechanism, please kindly refer tohttp://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/upr/index.htm
I would also ask you to check in the following web page the reports for the United States UPR:http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/PAGES/USSession9.aspx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Secretariat of the Human Rights Council
From: brenda norrell 
07.09.2010 19:19 ToUPRsubmissions@ohchr.org, civilsocietyunit@ohchr.org, ccastaneda@ohchr.org
Subject Indigenous submissions for US Periodic Review
UPR submissions OHCHR Hello,
Indigenous individuals and organizations who have not had the opportunity
to comment on the US Human Rights record, would like to do so before
the November session.
Please let me know how they can submit their statements.
Also, please note that many of the comments at the Listening Conferences from
Native Americans were not included in the US State Department's Periodic Review.
Sincerely, Brenda Norrell
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also see:
US State Department's watered-down 29-page Universal Periodic Review Report
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/146379.pdf

US Human Rights Network's 423 page full report:
http://www.ushrnetwork.org/sites/default/files/ushr_Final_for_print.pdf

The US State Dept.'s pathetic summaries:
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/upr/summaries/index.htm

Monday, September 13, 2010

THE STRANGE CASE OF THE DISAPPEARING CRIMINAL CASES

Think the only secret trials the U.S. is conducting is at Guantanamo?  Think again.



 Numerous decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court and a bevy of federal appeals courts have long held that there is a strong presumption that trials - both civil and criminal - should be held in public.

But too often they are not and the numbers are growing.

Paramilitary heads are escorted by Colombian policemen from a maximum security jail to Rionegro airport before their extradition to the U.S. to face drug trafficking charges on May 13, 2008. (Raul Arboleda/AFP/Getty Images)





Were not just talking about Patriot Act sort of hanky panking.  Judges can seal trials if they decide they should...and they do...thousands of times per year citing national security material, an ongoing government investigation, vulnerable witnesses or victims.  








Prosecutors must get permission from a higher up before they can request a sealed trial.  Whoopie, I bet that's tough.

We think of secret trials being used to get folks out of the way quietly who the authrities fear (and that is certainly one use, and a scary one).

However, there are other nefarious reasons as the following story from ProPbulica reveals.

COLOMBIAN PARAMILITARIES EXTRADITED TO U.S., WHERE CASES ARE SEALED

by Jennifer Janisch and Oriana Zill de Granados, Thirteen/WNET, and Chisun Lee, ProPublica Sep. 11, 12:43 a.m

A version of this story appeared in the Washington Post.




Since 2006, more than a dozen of Colombia's most notorious paramilitary leaders have been extradited to the United States to face drug-trafficking charges in federal district court in Washington.
The extraditions stunned Colombians, who had hoped that testimony from the men, given as part of a national amnesty program, would help expose the truth about two decades of vicious murders, assaults and kidnappings. In videotaped confessions in Colombia, one had taken responsibility for more than 450 slayings.
But outrage over the extraditions reached a boiling point earlier this year, when U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton blocked public access to seven of the paramilitary leaders' cases, erasing virtually every trace of their existence.
There is no way to know if the men have negotiated lenient sentences -- or if they are even still in custody. An eighth defendant, accused in Colombia of murdering a judge, was released on his own recognizance, records show, after cousins in College Park, Md., vouched for him.
The Colombian cases are drawing new attention to the practice of sealing entire court files, triggering a broader controversy over judicial secrecy.
Though court policies discourage this degree of secrecy, a 2009 internal study showed that federal judges order it in thousands of cases a year, sometimes without justification.
Some judges not only block public access, but also remove file numbers and all other signs of a case from the record. In the D.C. district, there is no uniform procedure for sealing a case, leaving individual judges to decide how much to disclose, Chief Judge Royce Lamberth said.
The cases against the Colombian paramilitaries show the stakes of a transparency debate that might otherwise seem academic.
Julio Henriquez, right, his wife Zulma Chacin and their daughter Bela. (Photo courtesy of Bela Henriquez)
Julio Henriquez, right, his wife Zulma Chacin and their daughter Bela. (Photo courtesy of Bela Henriquez)
"More than anger, I feel powerless," said Bela Henriquez, whose father, Julio, was kidnapped and killed on the orders of one defendant. "We don't know what they are negotiating, what conditions they are living under. What guarantee of justice do we have?"
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that public access to court cases is protected by the First Amendment because it is a crucial check on judicial power.
But some factors – national security material, an ongoing government investigation, vulnerable witnesses or victims -- can justify secrecy.
The cases involving the Colombians were probably sealed to protect the defendants' safety, because they are cooperating with U.S. drug enforcement authorities, several former prosecutors said. "It's very possible," Lamberth said. U.S. prosecutors, defense attorneys and Judge Walton declined to comment.
An agreement involving secrecy would require authorization at the highest levels of the Justice Department. Prosecutors must obtain approval from the deputy attorney general before requesting, or agreeing to, the sealing of a criminal case.
But ultimately, sealing decisions are made by individual judges. Court policies urge judges to shield as little as possible – a document, a witness's name – and for as short a time as possible. Total secrecy is supposed to be ordered only under "extraordinary circumstances," according to legal precedent. Even in those cases, judges are supposed to unseal records eventually.
In 2006, the Associated Press reported a sharp rise in secrecy in criminal cases, prompting concern that Bush-era prosecutors and judges too often operated outside public scrutiny.
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts supplied data for the study, but its spokesman, David Sellers, now says the figures provided were flawed. He said wide variations in record-keeping among individual courts make accurate tallies impossible.
A year after the AP report, the federal judiciary strongly urged courts to mark sealed cases as "under seal" rather than completely omitting them from the record, as happened in the Colombian cases. Yet, the 2009 internal study showed that a dozen courts still weren't complying.
That study, done by the research arm of the federal judiciary, looked at all cases that were fully sealed in 2006, giving perhaps the most complete picture of how — and how often — total secrecy is used.
Two percent of about 1 million cases filed that year were sealed. In many, the secrecy was justified, but researchers found dozens of instances of sealing for no legitimate reason. Approximately one of every 275 criminal cases in 2006 was fully sealed to protect cooperators or ongoing investigations.
Last month, the committee overseeing the study recommended that the judiciary's leadership remind judges not to order complete secrecy unless "there are no other options." The panel stopped short of suggesting that this be made mandatory.
"The number of sealed cases was so small," said Judge Harris Hartz of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, the committee's chairman. "Judges' decisions to seal a case are heavily dependent on the specific facts and circumstances of that case."
The panel recommended that electronic records systems in the courts be programmed to track sealing.
In Colombia, the secret U.S. prosecutions have darkened hopes of achieving redress for thousands of atrocities tied to a network of paramilitary groups known as the Self-Defense Forces of Colombia. The extradition of key leaders to the United States disrupted a historic amnesty program intended to demobilize units and deliver basic information, such as the location of bodies, to victims' relatives.
Roxanna Altholz, the acting director of the International Human Rights law Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley who represents Colombian victims of paramilitary violence, said the U.S. has broken a promise made on the day of the extraditions by Ambassador William Brownfield.
"The victims, their representatives and the prosecutors of Colombia will continue to have access in the U.S. to the legal system, to the extradited individuals, and to their assets," Brownfield said on May 13, 2008, in Colombia.
"So far," says Altholz, "none of those promises have been kept."
Human rights lawyers have been unable to track the status of at least 25 other Colombian paramilitary members being prosecuted in various U.S. courts because substantial portions of their cases have been sealed.
Lamberth acknowledged that victims may feel deprived of justice when cases are sealed.
"I honestly don't know how we balance letting victims have a say," he said. "If there is a way to do it without endangering" the lives of those who are cooperating, "we are open to that."
Given their brutal résumés, the whereabouts of the defendants are cause for concern, prosecutors said.
"If one of them could be living in Bethesda, for example, down the street from the Jones family with a dog and 2.5 kids, then the public has a strong interest in knowing that information," said David Weinstein, who prosecuted drug cases as an assistant U.S. attorney in Southern Florida from 1998 to 2009.
One paramilitary leader, Hughes Manuel Rodriguez Fuentes, was released on bond in 2008. Reporters visited an address in College Park where one of Rodriguez Fuentes' cousins lives, according to court records.
"I don't know where he is," said the relative. "And good luck finding him."
This article was reported as part of an upcomingThirteen/WNET documentary series called "Women, War & Peace," in conjunction with ProPublica.